Chuck Baldwin's latest column, "Three Peas in a Pod" really tells it like it is; especially about John McCain. It's a good one to give to people who are planning on voting for McCain.
On a more serious note, just because the MSM censor those who disagree with their worlview and agenda does not mean that BTM should do the same. How do you understand good unless you have evil to compare it with? If we demand that the MSM should give equal time to all points of view, how would it look if BTM refused to do just that?
It would be very helpful to analyse the advertising and propaganda conducted by the ruling elites to better understand the techniques they use to condition the masses. Then these insights can be used to educate and inform those who are being deluded. If there is (are) a member(s) of the advertising/marketing/propaganda echelon who is (are) also a member(s) of the freedom movement, perhaps they could create content of this nature to enlighten us all.
Because I see it for what it is.
A slap in the face to Ron Paul.
When you guy's are done being amused, I suggest you seriously consider how this looks on your website.
Cynde, look at the irony of this moreso than the fact that you don't like to see his ad here. I'm gonna give you an example of why it's really not that bad - it's a little different way of thinking but bear with me...
By acceptance of his ad here, then it's one less ad that he's paying to put on a site where someone actually cares. It's kind of like suppressing his message (from MSM sites) without all of the guilt and negativity of actually restricting their rights to advertise.
Check out the FAQ. It answers your question. There is a forum thread that addresses this as well.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams
Subscribe to this thread
Chuck Baldwin's latest column, "Three Peas in a Pod" really tells it like it is; especially about John McCain. It's a good one to give to people who are planning on voting for McCain.
On a more serious note, just because the MSM censor those who disagree with their worlview and agenda does not mean that BTM should do the same. How do you understand good unless you have evil to compare it with? If we demand that the MSM should give equal time to all points of view, how would it look if BTM refused to do just that?
It would be very helpful to analyse the advertising and propaganda conducted by the ruling elites to better understand the techniques they use to condition the masses. Then these insights can be used to educate and inform those who are being deluded. If there is (are) a member(s) of the advertising/marketing/propaganda echelon who is (are) also a member(s) of the freedom movement, perhaps they could create content of this nature to enlighten us all.
...
Why, Cynde? Find amusement, not indigestion. Life is so much more fun that way. R
Because I see it for what it is.
A slap in the face to Ron Paul.
When you guy's are done being amused, I suggest you seriously consider how this looks on your website.
Cynde, look at the irony of this moreso than the fact that you don't like to see his ad here. I'm gonna give you an example of why it's really not that bad - it's a little different way of thinking but bear with me...
By acceptance of his ad here, then it's one less ad that he's paying to put on a site where someone actually cares. It's kind of like suppressing his message (from MSM sites) without all of the guilt and negativity of actually restricting their rights to advertise.
I'm finding this a little more than hard to stomach!
Check out the FAQ. It answers your question. There is a forum thread that addresses this as well.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams