Censorship and Propaganda - Mainstream Media's Main Course

Sometimes a bad example can be helpful if only to help us identify what NOT to do; a sort of identifying best practices from worst practices. And because BreaktheMatrix was born of revulsion for what the mainstream media has become, it would be wise to identify the characteristics that we don't want to repeat with our new media company.

For starters, we're not serving the standard fare. While censorship and propaganda represent mainstream media's main course, we will offer neither. We will not filter stories deemed unpatriotic or potentially damaging to Americans' sense of nationalism. We will not omit news that portrays our government, our institutions, or our media as unethical, underhanded, or deceitful. We're leaving the censorship to our competitors. BreaktheMatrix.com is an alternative media model for the free flow of information. What a novel idea.

Propaganda is loosely defined as information put out by an organization or government to promote policy, an idea, or a cause. Here in America, it comes in all shapes and sizes and is served up so openly and often by the U.S. government and the mainstream media, that the majority of Americans gulp it down without chewing.

David Barstow's April 20, New York Times piece uncovering ties between the Pentagon and military analysts at NBC, ABC, CNN, and FOX among others, is one of the biggest stories of media-government collusion since Carl Berstein outed 400 journalists for working with the CIA (see article entitled "Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon's Hidden Hand" in the content section of BreaktheMatrix).

Not surprisingly, the major media outlets in question have all conveniently buried the story beneath wall-to-wall Clinton-Obama coverage and Barbara Wawa's affair thirty years ago with Senator what's-his-name. That's the media's way of assigning meaning to the meaningless, and its working well for them. Most Americans will never know that the military analysts hired by the networks received their information (and their lucrative government contracts) from the Pentagon.

If mainstream media has made it their mission to dumb down their audience, we are making it our mission to reverse the damage. If their content is meant to dull the senses, our is designed to sharpen them. If they fear triggering independent thought within their audience, we will strive to create critical thinkers within ours. I love it here already!

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
The reconfiguration of the

The reconfiguration of the site does not offer 'free flow', and is much like DIGG in its ability to be manipulated.

(another topic)
However, I can understand if the idea is to not scare off, but help with baby steps first.

I suppose we will see wont we..

rea1001.blogspot.com Posted by rea1001.blogspot.com on Thu, 05/08/2008 - 13:47
My only concern is the

My only concern is the presentation of opposing view points. A network that is entirely one sided runs the risk of being called out for such & in turn, being completely ignored. FOX news comes to mind here. Although it is not ignored, by this point in time, most can see what FOX news is all about, "Fair & Balanced"....Riiiiiight. There must be some presentation of opposing view. I know that also may present the danger of diluting our message. It will however lend credibliity to our fledgling network. Not credible because the view point of the mainstream brainwashers is the correct viewpoint, but because we openly invite their feeble reasoning and will, in our turn, shoot their "reasoning" full of holes for all the world to see and learn, and awaken. This perhaps is where NeoDaCon will best reinforce OUR message, if you follow my reasoning here.

Posted by Hope_Flow_89 on Thu, 05/08/2008 - 13:59
This is a test. The

This is a test.

The comment below is designed to verify the truth to Lisa's above post where Lisa says:

"...While censorship and propaganda represent mainstream media's main course, we will offer neither. We will not filter stories deemed unpatriotic or potentially damaging to Americans' sense of nationalism. We will not omit news that portrays our government, our institutions, or our media as unethical, underhanded, or deceitful. We're leaving the censorship to our competitors..."

_________________________________________________________________________

As a 46 year old Canadian with 100% German genes, I have had the unique perspective of growing up with a National Socialist perspective, only to have the MSM BS convince me of the incorrect nature of many of the principles that National Socialism advanced. I am not a National Socialist, for in Canada it is a Quasi-Criminal offense to be one and avowed National Socaialists are routinely thrown into jail, however there are many aspects of National Socialism that are based on Darwinian Theory.

In the last 10 years, I have again re-examined the scientific basis of many ideas that were in existence long before National Socialism came into being, but have been systematically inverted by the mainstream media.

Top among these are:

1) The correlation between Race, Behavior and Aptitude/Traits.
2) The Jewish mind (both "Hardwired" and learned)
3) The exclusion/vilification/criminalization of those with White Racialist/Nationalist sentiments.
4) The necessity of being Racially of a "larger brained" sub-race of humanoid in order to successfully develop a functioning democracy.

I would like to ask you, Lisa, will White Nationalists/Racialists (among others), be allowed to freely express their opinions, as long as they are "morally" acceptable? (Civilized and courteous yet blunt and "unorthodox")

(I use the word "morally" because according to reports, the Zionists seemingly in Charge of G. W. Bush and the Congress have recently formed some kind of branch dealing with "Global Anti-Semitism". It is a branch generally designed to criminalize the legitimate criticism of Jewish/Israeli Group behavior anywhere in the World, ( paid for by American Tax payers ), even if this criticism is truthful.)

There are literally 100's of thousands if not millions of Whites within America with Racialist tendencies, but they are vilified to no end in the mainstream media.

However, non-White nationalism (i.e. Black Nationalism: Rev. Wright's or Farakhan's, Mestizo Nationalism: La Raza, or Jewish Nationalism: AIPAC &/or Israel as a strictly "Jewish State") are not only NOT vilified they are routinely given a favourable twist by the mainstream media.
This is a form of brainwashing by the mainstream for it popularizes one view over another and eliminates a level playing field between all people.

Will "Breakthematrix" allow sentiments to be expressed (like White Nationalism) that even most Whites have been brainwashed to abhor?

Please remember, up until the take over of the MSM by a virtual "Zionist Oligarchy" around the end of WW2, the above topics were considered not only acceptable, but were subscribed to by the vast majority of our own, European descended, grand or great-grand parents.

In this new millennium, without ever really being given the chance in the MSM to explore these ideas for legitimate threads of truth, anyone who espouses ideas that uphold (especially White) Racialist sentiments is immediately "stoned" into obscurity.

Dear Lisa,

Will Breakthematrix, be just another "talk the talk but dare not walk the walk" sites
or
will you be strong enough to broach these types of topics and present uncensored views concerning these relevant issues?

albrechtvonontario Posted by albrechtvonontario on Thu, 05/08/2008 - 17:23
> Will Breakthematrix, be

> Will Breakthematrix, be just another "talk the talk but dare not walk the walk" sites or will you be strong enough to broach these types of topics and present uncensored views concerning these relevant issues?

i am reminded of a similar sentiment often expressed in the media: "will you be against the war or will you support our troops?"

nobody's buying your fuzzy logic.
express your racist views somewhere else.
they're not welcome here.
start thinking of yourself as an individual instead of a member of the white race and your silly notions will quickly disappear.

swarelis Posted by swarelis on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 02:03
1) I would like to see you

1) I would like to see you say that to the other races and see how they react to you!

(i.e. "...start thinking of yourself as an individual instead of a member of the [Jewish, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Amerindian, etc..] race and your silly notions will quickly disappear...")

But I assume that you do not have the cahoonas for that because members of those other (...non...?) Races would most likely not reply with civilized reasoned arguments, but react with law suites or worse,... violence towards you.

This is just the sort of MSM induced, mildly psychotic, and unhinged type of response I was referring to in my original comment.

2) Calling me a Racist is a defamation of my character! Normally it would outrage me but I know better.

You may as well call me a lover of Hitler as well and you can join the John McCain crowd when he insinuated the same about Ron Paul.

I treat everyone equally until they prove themselves unworthy of equal treatment and You have just done that (and I don't know, or care, what Race you belong to).

The fact that Races of humanity do exist is scientifically proven simply on the basis of Race specific pharmaceuticals being developed to target certain Races who are prone to certain diseases (among many other provable instances).

This is exactly the type of discussion that should be allowed in these forums because the forces we battle against are almost to a man controlled by Zionist Jews (Banks, Fed, MSM, Large Corporations, law makers, etc...). By not talking about a provable and obvious phenomenon, we limit ourselves from attacking the root of the problem and confine ourselves to the leaves.

3) By speaking for the site and saying I am "...not welcome here...", you are misrepresenting this site. If the administration does not defend itself from this misrepresentation it also speaks volumes about this site and it's leaders.

May I remind you that G. W. Bush used the phrase "...'fuzzy' math..." when he ran against Al Gore. And it worked in 2000, but it's 2008 and G.W. Bush and his Zionist handlers have been shown to be the ones who were fuzzy.

You are three for three:

1) Calling me a racist (Defamation of character)
2) Speaking for the site by saying I am not welcome here (Misrepresenting this site)
3) and appropriating G.W.Bush's rhetoric.

"...thou shalt know them by their actions..."

Show me one instance in my comment where I have been uncivilized, defamatory or made statements without giving reasons for their postulation. You on the other hand have have proven yourself to have done all three of the above. Based on this, it is you who should not be welcomed on this site not me.

albrechtvonontario Posted by albrechtvonontario on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 16:15
> 2) Calling me a Racist is

> 2) Calling me a Racist is a defamation of my character! Normally it would outrage me but I know better.

you are a racist. and you shouldn't be outraged when you're called that because that's what you are.

> You may as well call me a lover of Hitler as well and you can join the John McCain crowd when he insinuated the same about Ron Paul.

are you comparing me to John McCain and you to Ron Paul? did you take your pills today?

> the forces we battle against are almost to a man controlled by Zionist Jews (Banks, Fed, MSM, Large Corporations, law makers, etc...).

you're right, you sound exactly like Ron Paul. i remember his many speeches warning of the zionist jews and their agenda.

> By speaking for the site and saying I am "...not welcome here...", you are misrepresenting this site.

learn to read bud. i said your views are not welcome here let me repost so you can get a good look at it again and not invent issues you can make arguments against:
[...] express your racist views somewhere else. they're not welcome here. [...]

>1) Calling me a racist (Defamation of character)

buddy... you are a racist. calling you a racist when you are one isn't defamation of anything. you're "defamating" yourself.

2) Speaking for the site by saying I am not welcome here (Misrepresenting this site)

refer to my earlier explanation about how you invented this point.

3) and appropriating G.W.Bush's rhetoric.

this one is priceless. i'll let this one be. it is clear from my previous comment calling you out on racist remarks that i'm appropriating g.w. bush's rhetoric. you make perfect sense. let me again say the same thing:
your racist comments are not welcome here.

swarelis Posted by swarelis on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 17:08
Wow!

First of all, thanks Lisa for broaching this subject.

Now, IMHO, I would like to say that ALL ideas are important. Not just the ones we approve of, but ALL simply due to the fact that we are not all-powerful and need the viewpoints of others to make us think FOR OURSELVES!

It has been my personal experience that all problems of humanity stem first from the belief that one is better than someone else. Even the contrite subservience to bow before more powerful statesmen is a "non-violent" way of approving of there actions.

Going back to the earliest known recordings in judeo-christian writings we find that Cain slew Abel because of the fear that Abel might be better than Cain.

How many times have we rooted for the "winner", simply because they were "winning"? It doesn't matter that the reason they were "winning" is because of some deceit, but simply because we justify their cause by right of might.

I hate the phrase, "Why can't we all just get along" because that is a silly question. We CAN all get along, momentarily. It should never be assumed that this will be a continuous process because there are so many relevant factors that influence the thinking of every individual.

It's just like in combat; one would think that the best soldier is the guy who always wins the bare-knuckles fist-fight, but that individual becomes a whimpering sniveling "coward" when he endures his first mortar attack. There is no foe to fight back against. You either hunker down and do your best to survive, or you jump and run only to be cut down by flying shrapnel. There is much to be said in defense of the phrase, "Discretion is the better part of valor".

My personal definition of "hero" is one who does his job, five minutes longer than necessary. Heroics are fleeting moments, just the same as panic attacks. It all depends on who you are AT THAT MOMENT, although training helps. Few people who have ever faced the all-out non-stop terror of war will ever call another person a coward. Cowardice is also fleeting, and we all have our moments of cowardice and heroics.

Al of Ontario, I salute you for speaking out on the subjects of your beliefs. You are a courageous individual to put forth an antithesis and we need far more of it. But, as Voltaire said to Helvetius, "I may not believe a word you are saying, but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it."

Perhaps you will say it is because I too am of Germanic decent (Herbert von Braun would be my name if my great-grandfather didn't like being called "Brawn" instead of "Brown") that I can think for myself. I'd prefer to say that it is because I have lived (truly lived!) for 65 years, even though there were times I never thought the neighbors would allow it!

You see, the other half of my equation is Cherokee. So I believe that no man can tell another what to do, but if you try to tell me what to do, then you will find out what my gran'pappy meant when he told me, "If ya can't listen, you can feel!"

Might may not always make right, but it sure can be a conversation stopper!

Belief is a powerful and motivating force. Whether it is right or wrong depends highly on the viewpoint of the observer. I personally think it is far more important to take a stand and espouse ones belief than it is to simply sit back and nod/shake ones head at the actions of others. At least you know where you stand with such a person.

Welcome to the breaking of the matrix, sir!

I don't worry about nuthin.....
Unless it jumps right out in front of me......
Then I don't worry about it......
Unless it tries to bite me.......
Then I don't worry about it......
I just kill it!
No worries!

herbertebrownii Posted by herbertebrownii on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 15:31
Interesting post

Interesting post albrechtvonontario. Although I am well aware of Zionists & their evil agenda, why are you asking about "White Racialists"? What's next;

Dear Lisa,

Will you edit or remove posts written by or about pedophile goat f*ckers, or kid (young goats) sex?"

What exactly are you asking? Posts by any form of racist is undesireable. After all it is not by the color of ones skin or their ethnic background that one should be judged, but by an individual's or group's actions.

Although Zionists insist that they are Jewish (Yes, I know there are countless Christian Zionists) it is not the religion of Judaism that is the problem, not at all. It is the actions of these Zionists that is reprehensable.

Any post claiming any ethnic group or race is undesirable is approaching the problem from the wrong direction.

It is all about actions.

Posted by Hope_Flow_89 on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 01:17
Why am I asking about White

Why am I asking about White Racialists?

1) That's just the point! Where in the constitution does it say I am NOT allowed to talk about them? Yet you make it sound as if I am the one who has committed some grave crime when it is in fact that it is you who comes across, IMO, as mildly brainwashed.

2) I do not have a Freudian tendency of reverting to, IMO, filth and perversion when talking about hard science, so I will leave the goat f*ckers comment in your court.

3) By mis-characterizing my somewhat Racialist (not Racist) comments and grouping them with filth and profanity you are showing your true nature as an individual.

4) How much clearer do I need to make myself? Canadians are generally well known, the World over, for being impeccably polite and civilized as well as being quite intelligent and very, very fair minded. I would certainly NOT allow ANY comment to stand on this site. I made mention of the term, "...civilized..." .

You said:

"...After all it is not by the color of ones skin or their ethnic background that one should be judged, but by an individual's or group's actions..."

I agree. However that is a Western European, "Magna Cartaian" (if I may) concept and did not originate in the Bush-lands of Africa, the deserts of the Middle East or the Temples of the Ming Dynasty. I also think that one CAN be judged by their biological make-up.

By reverting to preconceptions as to what basis we judge anything, that have been impregnated into our minds over decades of MSM abuse, you offer no hard evidence for your opinions, just rhetoric.

Science has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt the differences between the Races of humans. I do not need to dwell on them here. If you dispute the scientific fact that Race exists and that their differences also exist then all I can say is start reading Darwinian Theory and follow it to its logical conclusion in this millennium.

The MSM Hollywood Juggernaut is free to say "White Men Can't Jump", but I am not allowed to say, for example that, "Black men can't swim" ! ?

That's a double standard yet both are based on biological Racial truths.

The fact that there are other races and nations chalked full of people who do not hold concepts of equality before the law, free speech and being honest and truthful as dear as we ourselves hold them, gives me cause for great pause!

I, more than most, know there are always people that break the mold of "general behavior patterns" (read my profile). Nevertheless, generalities are where people begin in their assessment of others, and upon closer scrutiny they refine their opinions of individuals based on specific behavior.

To turn the tables on you as a devils advocate, I WOULD NOT say that ALL Zionists are the problem.

Take John Hagee and is Christian-Zionist Ministry for example.

How many of those God fearing congregationalists have been duped into supporting the Rothschild-Liebermann-Chertoff-McCain lies by John Hagee's smooth talking and powerful rhetoric?

The Christian Zionist Flock may be fueling the problem, but I do not blame them entirely.

They gave their hearts trustingly to a man on a, IMO, devious mission.

I do hold the Zionist leadership and facilitators responsible and they, almost to a man, happen to be of genetically Jewish character. To ignore this is to ignore hard science and waste resources investigating frivolous suspects.

Racial traits bind a people together and help them act in unison for or against (depending on what's judged to benefit them) those who are divided.

It's not about one Race or another being undesirable for each Race has it's place on the planet just like each species of wild animal should have its place.

It's about obvious Racial loyalties and Racially profiling people as a general starting point to help us pin point specific threats.

I find it highly irresponsible and a waste of resources to be checking bags of little, old, mid-western, White ladies boarding a plane that is full of Saudi Extremists and Jewish Supremacists coming out of Istanbul into NY city when in fact it has been proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that almost NO old White ladies have committed acts of terror against the USA and that Jews and Arabs have done so in droves.

And do not think I am targeting just Jews and Arabs by my comments. I am just using this as an example. What I am saying is, let's use some common sense and stop letting this "learned MSM induced" political correctness BS limit our range of discussion as long as we remain civilized and reasonable.

In my original comment I also said each person has their own biases, that includes me last time I checked (unless you happen to be a Talmudic Jew and views me as an animal ! LOL).

I welcome criticism of those biases when they pop up. I do not however tolerate frivolous attacks and defamation because I have broached one of the MSM sacred cows.

albrechtvonontario Posted by albrechtvonontario on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 17:33
Albrechtvonontario –

Albrechtvonontario – Please accept my humble apology for the “goat f*cker” comment. It was a knee jerk reaction and inappropriate. Please notice that I didn’t call you a goat f*cker. My most genuine apologies sir.

In regards to Zionists (ALL OF THEM, JEWISH, CHRISTIAN WHATEVER) I will be forever vigilant and wary. Zionism is a mind set, a political movement. It knows no racial boundaries.

I do not argue that different races of human beings have different fundamental genetic make ups. To argue that would just be ridiculous. However, I will stand by my argument that it is a person’s or group’s actions that must be the criteria by which they are judged. Whether that is Magna Carterian or not is irrelevant. Just because in the grand scheme of time ideas from the Magna Carta are relatively recent does not make them incorrect.

Your observation regarding “racial loyalties” is spot on. This is how young Jewish children are indoctrinated by their Zionist masters.

Have you heard of the group Jews Against Zionism? Put it in your search engine and check them out. I love these people, God bless them all.

Please accept this olive branch Albrechtvonontario for we agree on far more than we disagree.

Humbly,

Hope_Flow_89

Posted by Hope_Flow_89 on Fri, 05/09/2008 - 18:35
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
 
Total,5384016