Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Here is ONE THING that

Here is ONE THING that bothers me about 9/11 ...

On December 11, 2005 I wrote an article entitled National Security Code Access and 9/11 This short document printed the ONE QUESTION that I have been asking people about 9/11, which is as follows:

There is one aspect of 9/11 that alone proves that it was an INSIDE JOB.

Those carrying out these attacks would have had to contend with NATIONAL SECURITY CODES that are changed daily, and some are changed hourly. Arabs in a cave in Afghanistan would have had to deal with these codes to access the NATIONAL SECURITY, NSA, and NORTHCOM computer networks. The ONLY WAY that they could have had access to this HIGHLY SENSITIVE DATA is by a mole inside providing this information.

Such a person would have to have been on the level of the JOINT CHIEFS and the NSA to have access to the CORRECT DATA.

Additionally, they would have had to have had full access to the Air-Traffic Control network and the grid that overlays the entire USA. These perpetraitors would also had to have had access to the communications from the towers in numerous cities and the computer networks of the airlines.

These Neo-Nazi-Cons were bold enough to suggest that a small handful of insurgent terrorists were controlling these attacks from a cave half a world away, using a laptop computer.

Are you $&*$!@# kidding me?!

By the way, for a close-up view of how NATIONAL SECURITY CODES are used and implemented, please see the 1985 film THE FALCON AND THE SNOWMAN, starring Timothy Hutton and Sean Penn.

NOTE: If any reader can explain how outsiders could have defeated such inside networks and codes WITHOUT internal complicity, I am all ears ...

SO, HERE'S THE CHALLENGE ...

All a person has to do is provide evidence or documentation that PROVES that the so-called 'Arab Terrorists' were able to bypass NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCES AND PASSWORDS without the knowledge or assistance of anyone inside the federal government of the United States of AmeriKa.

Remember the following when attempting to answer the challenge:

1. National Security Clearances and access to passwords which change daily is one thing the 'terrorists' would have to contend with. HOW could they gain access to these systems WITHOUT inside help?

2. The federal government of the United States uses a level of computer network encryption that is NOT available to the public. HOW could these 'terrorists' gain access to these NATIONAL SECURITY NETWORKS without the requisite encryption UNLOCK key?

3. Pulling off 9/11 would have required access to MULTIPLE COMPUTER NETWORKS; among them are the computer systems of the following: NSA, CIA, FBI, NORTHCOM, and the computer networks of American and United Airlines, as well as access to the National Federal Aviation Administration's Air-Traffic Control network. Finally, they would have also needed to gain access to voice recognition and editing software, which would have been required to mimic the voices of the various passengers in the faked cell phone calls which were allegedly placed from the planes. Lastly, the 'terrorists' would have had to gain access also to the cell phone companies that were infiltrated to place the faked calls, making them appear to have originated from the doomed planes.

Could these 'terrorists' who were supposedly sitting in a cave in Afghanistan, with nothing more than a notebook computer, hacked into ALL of these systems WITHOUT inside help?

SO, HERE IS HOW TO WIN $10,000 FROM THE KENTROVERSY PAPERS:

All anyone needs to do is supply me with evidence and irrefutable proof that every system named above could be hacked WITHOUT inside help. The funds in the amount of $10,000 are on deposit and just waiting for YOUR PROOF.

Your entries may be sent to me via my e-mail address, which can be found on the front page of this site, in the section entitled CONTACTING KENTROVERSY.

If there are any entries that appear to have the ANSWER without inside help, it will be examined to determine if the money can be rightfully claimed based on your submitted proof.

That's ALL there is to it!

© 2006 Kentroversy Papers
All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Sources:

The following sources were used in the creation of this Kentroversy Paper . . .

National Security Code Access and 9/11 (December 11, 2005)

Scholars For 9/11 Truth

http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/04/kentroversy-papers-10000-9...

rea1001.blogspot.com Posted by rea1001.blogspot.com on Thu, 05/01/2008 - 02:47
The whole premise of this

The whole premise of this argument is wrong. You tell us what 'must' have happened repeatedly, but at no time do you explain why they must have happened.

Why all the emphasis about hacking the myriad of systems? You don't need to do that to hijack an aeroplane and fly it into a building.

A much clearer understanding is available through the many 9/11 videos available online, which explains that the normal interception routines were not in effect because the military had been instructed to run exercises.

I don't disagree with the inside job element of your argument, but I don't need to research the whole national security code implementation to find that out.

-~-~-~-~-~--
Anyone fancy running a hiking website? I'm having to close it down in July.
http://www.hikerbox.net
~-~-~-~-~-~

sheeple2peeple Posted by sheeple2peeple on Thu, 05/01/2008 - 10:00
The NSA listening stations

The NSA listening stations started in the early 50s, since then the NSA has perfected their technology, and capabilities. When you arrive in the United State, or in the US being trained and housed at an Military base; as they where, then I common knowledge the intelligence services are going to know where a supposed terrorist is. The NSA along with the CIA have also had the capabilities to monitor all video in real time, much like we have seen in the Bourne Identity. It is little wonder then that Hollywood has direct representatives from the CIA and NSA helping them with gaining knowledge of the workings of these two organizations for movies that are being worked on as guidance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON

This has been publicly admitted many times.

Never mind the fact that the US government created al-CIATA in the first place. The Bush and Bin ladens are old buddies going back in the OIL BUSINESS. That is also public knowledge.

rea1001.blogspot.com Posted by rea1001.blogspot.com on Thu, 05/01/2008 - 21:31
Actually you are wrong. For

Actually you are wrong. For the so called 'hijackers' to even have entered the country, they would have to had to by passed Echelon. Echelon would have picked up their names up entry. One strike, the rest gets more complicated; as you have said, which makes it more improbable, thus making it more unlikely to happen by chance. You add this to the already large number of astronomical improbabilities and, well, it becomes improbable.

rea1001.blogspot.com Posted by rea1001.blogspot.com on Thu, 05/01/2008 - 10:11
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.