Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Big tit anal sex movie

Amateur with natural big boob-Cori the natural milf shows off her big juicy tits
Free big tit blonde movie-Samantha babe plays with big boobs and poses in bed
Big tit porn star movie-Movies of beauty blonde babe with nylons on and high heels
Big tit anal sex movie-Movies of a glamorous redhead babe squirting like crazy

Posted by bashibozuk on Fri, 07/03/2009 - 4:45am
dfg Posted by ksall on Wed, 07/01/2009 - 1:01pm
Anyone care

to provide a translation? My guess is that there's something nice about Jihad here and that BTM will probably be placed on a terrorist watch list as a result!

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Wed, 07/01/2009 - 1:11pm
oh yeah, the markets are rigged!

forgot to say that.

saucerman Posted by saucerman on Fri, 07/03/2009 - 9:16am
Damnit Adam, this is happening more and more!

What the hell is going on? Look at all the garbage posted to this website now. Is there anyone monitoring?

saucerman Posted by saucerman on Fri, 07/03/2009 - 8:55am
Yeah,

I've noticed it also,

Mess up the forum with a lot of noise, to discourage (new) readers.

It seems that this is all parked on the back end, dead part of the parking lot, waiting for a slow death
--
Don't Think, Act!
Don't Question, Follow!

And don't bother telling an enraged lynch mob with a raging bloodlust, the truth.

TranceAm Posted by TranceAm on Fri, 07/03/2009 - 9:19am
sdfg

دردشة | شات | دردشه | شات كتابي | دردشة كتابية | شات صوتي | دردشة صوتية | العاب | صور | يوتيوب | بلوتوث | توبيكات | اسلاميات | ترجمة | شاتات خليجية | شات الشله | شات الود | شات قلبي | شات الديوان | شات مصراوي | شات علي بابا | شات عبير | شات كازانوفا | شات حدود | شات كويت 500 | شات حلا | شات الوسام | شات الخليج | شات ياعمري | شات بوابة العرب | شات الحب | شات دلوع | شات تغاريد | شات بنات نجد | شات الساهر 2000 | شات وناسة | شات بنات السعودية | شات بحر الكويت | شات كويت دلع | شات البراق | شات بيبسي | شات ماسة | شات بنت السعودية | شات شلة بنات | شات كواسر | شات العين | شات مياسة | شات تعب قلبي | شات على البال | شات مزيكتك | شات خجل | شات دوت كوم | شات بنوته | شات الحب | شات لؤلؤة | شات سارق القلوب | شات الماس | شات عمري | شات عمان | شات قطر | شات الغلا | شات غير | شات بحر الشوق | شات وعد | شات ابن اليمن | شات جروح | شات كويت 35 | شات عدن | شات روحي تحبك | شات مدار الروح | شات دنيا الوله | شات عروبة | شات اليل | شات ولايف | شات عطر | شات مياس القلوب | شات نبض العرب | شات سحايب | شات بنت نت | شات دلع الريم | شات ناعم العود | شات العشاق | شات الهمس | شات عهود | شات الحور | شات دلع السعودية | شات سواح | شات بواسل | شات حبيبتي | شات بحريني ون | شات المتون | شات نص كم | شات بنات قطر | شات العود | شات الجوارح | شات بنات نت | شات متيم | شات التنسيم | شات انين | شات شجون | شات بنت جازان | شات المملكة | شات الساهر | شات الذوق | شات الدانة | شات المستكشف | شات ياهلا | شات البسوس | شات بحور الالم | شات حروف | شات نجمة | شات حسايف | شات الحلم العربي | شات شبيك لبيك | شات بنت العرب | شات سحر الدلع | شات القمرا | شات المزيون | شات ودود | شات عربنا | شات اشتاق | شات النهر | شات حب كويت | شات حنان | شات بحور الحب | شات الوجود | شات لمسة حب | شات الورود | شات باب | شات شموع نجد | شات شوق | شات شموع | شات لذة غرام | شات دلع | دردشة دردش | شات دلوعتي | شات الريح | شات قمر الرياض | شات الدلع | شات براءة | شات روح الوفاء | شات الموعد | شات رجة | شات لونلي | شات جبر الخواطر | شات اميرة الكون | شات بنات الكلية | شات بنات العرب | شات قمر العرب | شات الفاتن | شات وردة العشاق | شات احلا دنيا | شات نادي العرب | شات قطر روز | شات حبي | شات وعد | شات حياتي | شات لهفة | شات سارة | شات مملكة حبي | شات الخليج | شات الجوهرة | شات ام الدنيا | شات كيوكات | شات رومنسية | شات مزاجيات | شات كفاك غرور | شات بنات الكويت | شات مزاجك | شات احساس | شات البحرين | شات كويت 29 | شات الحيران | شات سعودي | شات برق | شات غزل | شات فتافيت سكر | شات عرب حب | شات دمعة الم | شات ندى الورد | شات انت عمري | شات الكوت | شات مملكة الحب | مملكة الشخصيات | شات الجبيل | شات رعشة هدب | شات احلى عرب | شات ليالينا | شات غلاي | شات الحلم | شات هدب عيني | شات ترحال العرب | جات 4 جات | شات مملكة الدلع | شات الزهور | شات عطر المحبة | شات دانة الكويت | شات العشق | شات لبيه | شات اماسي | شات مساهير الغلا | شات دلع فلسطين | شات جود | شات قمر 14 | شات حبيب قلبي | شات السحر | شات طي | شات الهنوف | شات همس الحب | شات ورودي | شات الدروازة | شات عين الامارات | شات شلة مجنونة | شات كتكات العرب | شات ضوء القمر | شات تي روز | شات العبير | شات الفجر | شات رومنس | شات نجديات | شات غرام | شات مزوح | شات الدمعة | شات كويت عسل | شات كريستال | شات البدر | شات دانة الخليج | شات عاشق القلوب | شات الحنين | شات تدلل | شات خواطر | شات اساطير | شات الجوارح | شات قطر الحب | شات الزمن | شات بنت 14 | شات رماد الحب | شات خفايا الشوق | شات الحرية | شات زعلانة | شات الفنان | شات روحي | شات ذوق | شات كويت الحب | شات لجين | شات حبايب | شات ليان | شات المشتاق | شات حمودي | شات بنت الجامعة | شات همسة حب | شات فوز | شات باختصار | شات حبايب | شات دلع | شات نوف | شات حلو | شات عاشق | شات شمعة حياتي | شات مشاعل نجد | شات الجوري | شات مملكتي | شات المجد | شات المها | شات همسة حب | شات نعومي |
دردشة قلوب الكتابية |

Posted by ksall on Wed, 07/01/2009 - 1:01pm
Central Banking... Posted by KarmaField on Mon, 06/29/2009 - 12:34pm
Free markets are lead to to

Free markets are lead to to be fair, but are they really?
The smallest investor in the stock market is meant to face the same odds as the richest, and that is what leads cost free markets free.
Free markets are also meant to provide all participants with the same information about stocks, bonds, and currencies - that way all the investors have an equal odds of making a profit.
The market also gives investors to pool their resources into mutual or hedge funds, so properties can punch way above their weight. IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn announced the IMF will make emergency loans available to emerging economies.

Posted by helend22 on Fri, 04/03/2009 - 7:04pm
..

شات-دردشة
كتابية
-العاب-منتدى الفتاة
المسلمة

صوتيات
و مرئيات و اناشيد اسلامية

المنتدى
العام

منتدى
الترحيب بالاعضاء الجدد

منتدى النقاش
الجاد

العاب
منتديات بنات ستايل

نكت و طرائف
السياحة و
السفر

ازياء و موضة
اكسسوارات و
مجوهرات

ميك اب و
مكياج

فساتين سهرة
و زفاف

تسريحات
واخر موضات الشعر

العناية
بالبشرة و الشعر

ركن العطور
و البخور و مساحيق التجميل

ديكور و
اثاث المنازل

مول بنات
ستايل

اطباق
رئيسيه

حلويات و
معجنات و عصيرات

سلطات

روايات
ادبية
- همس الخواطر
قصص و
حكايات

شعر و قصائد

المنتدى
الطبي العام

المشاكل
النفسية و الاجتماعية و العاطفية

الامومة و
الطفولة

منتدى الصور
و الغرائب

تصاميم و
ابداعات العضوات

مسجات
ثيمات جوال
برامج
كمبيوتر و جوال

اخبار الفن
و الفنانين
-a1-شات
الرياض
-
دردشة صوتية
-العاب
بنات
-العاب باربي-العاب
مغامرات
-العاب سباق دراجات-العاب
ذكاء
-العاب متنوعة-العاب
قص الشعر
-العاب تلبيس-العاب
تلوين
-العاب ديكور-العاب
مطاردات سريعة
-العاب رياضية-العاب
تلبيس عرايس
-العاب طبخ-العاب
حربية
-العاب قتالية-العاب
افلام كرتون
-العاب مكياج-العاب
سباق سيارات
-العاب ورق-العاب
اطفال
-منتديات-مركز
تحميل الصور
---ارشيف-الارشيف-بنات ستايل-منتديات
بنات ستايل
-ارشيف بنات-business
directory
-business-health-xml-map-العاب باربي -
العاب بنات-
بروكسي
- يوتيوب-العاب -

العاب بنات - العاب
باربي
- العاب اكشن
- العاب تلبيس -
منتدى
-
بنات ستايل-منتديات
بنات ستايل
-توبيكات
بنات
-العاب بنات-ارشيف
بنات
-منتديات فتيات-منتدى
عام
-نقاش جاد-نكت
وطرائف
-سياحة وسفر-موضة-اكسسوارات-مكياج-فساتين
سهرة
-تسريحات-البشرة-ديكور-عالم
حواء
-اطباق رئيسيه-حلويات
و معجنات
-سلطات-روايات
ادبية
-همس القوافي-قصص-اشعار-منتديات
طبية
-عيادات نفسية-منتديات
الامومة و الطفولة
-منتديات
الصور
-مسجات بنات
ستايل
-ثيمات جوالات-برامج
كمبيوتر و جوال
-اخبار
الفنانين
-منتديات اسلامية-اناشيد-منتديات
عامة
-سياحة وسفر-صور-مسلسلات-انمي-اخبار
الفن
-افلام-افلام
اجنبية
-خواطر-روايات-شعر-قصص-امثال-صور
سيارات
-مصارعة-نكت-تحميل
العاب
-برامج-توبيكات-كتب-برامج
جوال
-مقاطع فيديومسجات-نغمات
mp3
ثيماتفوتوشوبازياءديكورحلوياتالطب البديلقصصشات
بنات السعودية
عمرو خالد-نانسي عجرمياسر القحطاني<نغمات نوكيابنات عوانسشات كويتيهيفاء وهبي
ناصر الفراعنة

Posted by renato9 on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 8:25pm
I can remember the late 90s

I can remember the late 90s quite well. I had just got in the stock market, only to lose it with the internet bubble. One of the stocks I had invested in was Excite AtHome (Nasdaq: ATHM).
I watched with disbelief, AT&T and Comcast's doings as board members who owned a lot of share. As a shareholder, I believe they purposefully ran that company into the ground, only to squash an emerging company with 35 billion in asset value before the collapse. AT&T walked away with 4.4 monthly paying subscribers (from Excite portal) switching them to AT&T . net
Comcast, well, now no longer has a competitor in the fiber optic, cable business.

Like some say that lack of due diligence to it's shareholders is what Bank of America is guilty of for allowing Merril Lynch bonuses, this is par for course, as is the ATHM fraud that played out. As an investor who lost, I claimed manipulation early on.

The courts are frauds as well. The Ma Bell connection is there. Nothing ever happened with regard to class action lawsuit. And in the end, the Internet Bubble burst. Others will say it was a bubble bursting, buyer beware etc, No that was manipulation and fraud, and AT&T and Comcast ran Excite At Home into the ground.

Like Franklin Raines cookin the books to collect CEO pay for himself and bonuses for others, they like Enron, fraudulently looted from the coffers, as Enron looted the ratepayers and shareholders alike. 450 million dollar executive parachute package?

I've been screaming manipulation since the late 90's. Every time Greenspan spoke the market reacted. He just kept manipulating interest rates again and again, suckering everybody in for the housing bubble.

I've been screaming that they have not been letting the markets run on their own for a very long time. I've said that with the stock market, I've said that with the housing market and interest rates, and it is clear to me that this is fraud and manipulation.

I now will never purchase another stock. Because I lost all trust in the financial system and the courts.

I then got into gold and silver, and again, since September 15th, there have been unusual trades and market manipulation, plain as day. I believe they manipulated gold and silver levels down so low, timed with September 15th, and Freddie and Fannie problems so as to avoid safe haven buyers into gold and silver. That was a buying sign for me. They did that to avoid people fleeing the market. That is manipulation. I don't believe as of late, that there has been widespread market manipulation in the noble metals, but it was quite obvious to me after September 15th, 2008.

And get this. I have no proof to anything I said.

Who is the amateur?

I have no proof to any of my claims. But clearly this is fraud and manipulation. They suckered everybody in with manipulated interest rates and predatory lending practices. For years, on a daily basis, I was getting multiple refinance letters sent to my house, offering me loans well beyond the cost of my house. I could refinance and take out cash. I think Capital One sent me something at least weekly.

Predatory, Fraudulent, Manipulatory.

This is how it will go down. This is how they took down America as we know it. You need no proof. It is all right there. You can look back and see it.

As I said before, I will never invest in stock ever again. And the SEC is as fraudulent as Freddie and Fannie and all the other criminal sheisters.

WOODMAN Posted by WOODMAN on Sat, 03/07/2009 - 7:00pm
Rigged? no way . . .

This is a first that I am at a loss with words. All I can do is maybe provide a little comfort music . . .

average joe

Average Joe Posted by Average Joe on Sat, 03/07/2009 - 4:25pm
Please Contribute to Early Ballot Access for the 3rd Parties...

Hello Friends of Freedom,

http://www.freedomballotaccess.org - This site finances early ballot access for the Libertarian and Constitution Parties (and any other "third party" to contact me) for 2010 and 2012, so that they know they are on the ballot years before the election, and can spend their time campaigning and not jumping through hoops to get on the ballot.

Let's get the hoop jumping done early this time, so a new version of Ron Paul can emerge.

Sincerely,

Jake Witmer
907-250-5503

"I'm voting for Wayne Root, the Libertarian Candidate for President of the United States, on November 6, 2012."
http://www.rootforamerica.com

Jake_Witmer Posted by Jake_Witmer on Thu, 09/18/2008 - 3:26am
Dr Ron Paul could have Obama

Dr Ron Paul could have Obama for lunch, on the economic problems and the war
and everything else. Things are moving so fast, now is the time (48 hrs) for
Dr. Ron Paul to appear in Fridays debate and save this country.....
McCain says he isn't going to be there. What a awesome time for anther
Republican to appear on the scene
online degree in english and online architecture degree

Posted by markweee on Mon, 05/11/2009 - 10:53pm
People are stupid; given

People are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it’s true, or because they are afraid it might be true." -Terry Goodkind
online management degrees and design associate degree online

Posted by markweee on Mon, 05/11/2009 - 10:53pm
Alonso F for "Please Contribute to Early Ballot Access.........

The uptick rule prohibits a type of stock trade known as short selling, usually most profitable in a bear market. Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, for reinstatement, has recommended the uptick rule. In essence, short selling is a transaction in which a company, or individual, borrows stock from the holder, and then sells it to someone else with an agreement to buy it back from the original lender. If the stock drops in value, the middleman profits, but if it climbs, they lose money. When markets take a downturn, then short selling increases to make money, but it stays depressed – which is why some people want the Quick Payday Loans in solution to financial crisis.

Posted by AlonsoF on Wed, 03/04/2009 - 3:56am
Tom, AdamAdamR, blloyd

Have you guys seen The Money Masters DVD? http://www.themoneymasters.com/synopsis.htm

From the website:

"THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers.

The success of the central banking scheme developed into a far-reaching plan described by President Clinton's mentor, Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley, "to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank....sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the levels of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

Several short-lived attempts to impose the central banking scheme on the United States were defeated by the patriotic efforts of Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln. But with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, America was firmly lashed to the same yoke, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the masses a yoke little better than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by the American people today ($80,000 per American) ultimately to these bankers.

This vast accumulation of wealth concentrates immense power and despotic economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers "who are able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying, so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so that no one dare breathe against their will.""

Even though it was made prior to the 1996 election, it's relevance to what is happening today is astounding. If you haven't seen it, I'd highly recommend watching it and then continuing your debate as to whether there is intentional market manipulation or just unintended consequences from government and Federal Reserve intervention. Regardless, I think you all agree that a truly free market would be best. Right?

Posted by LauraB on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 5:04pm
Well, if it's that old...

If the central banking system is that old... then it belongs in a Rest Home, where it can blabber and burp, and face its inevitable death.

________________
Freedom is an inside job

Truthserum Posted by Truthserum on Thu, 09/25/2008 - 5:34pm
on youtube..

& video section of BTM..

Look up Fiat Currency for another good one.. Also in BTM & Youtube...

for free....

studyoflife74 Posted by studyoflife74 on Sat, 08/30/2008 - 2:57pm
Yes Laura, I've seen it

and many movies like it. They offer evidence, motive, and plenty of witnesses to the ongoing manipulations of the market and the currencies that take place under the guise of the fed.

blloyd has not seen it, but he doesn't need to because he already knows everything about it

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Fri, 08/29/2008 - 11:18pm
Cramer the Contra-Indicator

By the way, Cramer makes for an excellent contra-indicator: historically, you're better off doing the opposite of what he recommends.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Cramer

Unfortunately of course he's wildly popular and thus deluding a great number of people.

If ever a time should come when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin. (Samuel Adams)

dbthayer Posted by dbthayer on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 9:45am
Yes, I'm aware of that about Cramer

I think it's very entertaining to watch him flip out, which is really the original intent of this post

Here he is flipping out on Fox while openly yelling about insider trading and stock manipulations. I think there's something wonderfully ironic about this since he is on record as being open to using every available avenue to deceive investors and inflate stock values when it's in his interest. I think it takes one to know one, and being of the opinion that the markets are heavily manipulated, I find it especially humorous to watch him proclaim how unfair it is. It sounds like he bet the wrong way again.

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Tue, 08/26/2008 - 8:50pm
Being a loud flip flopping entertainer

doesn't negate being an experienced and informed investor

he's both, anyhow, people have been rigging markets since their have been markets... I don't find anything wild about that

However, if you want to be the policeman of unfounded accusations, perhaps you should interrogate your statement:

"you seem to get a lot of your opinions from people like Cramer"

just for kicks: what opinions are you referring to and what people (like Cramer) are you referring to?

I don't think you've done your homework on me for starters, but if you were interested there's about dozens of pages of forums, blogs, comments, etc. going back several months

I'm not sure what your general point is. You seem to enjoy being the voice of doubt and disbelief, and there's really no shortage of people who enjoy taking this position. Its a very easy position to assume because it requires no research, no original ideas and no creative thinking. You just have to wait for other people to talk and then you cross your arms and say, "Oh Yeah. Prove it!"

Of course, when your ideas and assumptions are challenged you fall into kind of an amateur impersonation of Bill O'Reilly. By that I'm referring to your name calling, accusations, and stubborn attacks.

The statement you quoted refers to the fact that congress and fed are openly discussing injecting billions into fannie and fred and are actively considering a gov't takeover of the companies. This, in and of itself, is a form of manipulation.

Beyond that, I find Cramer both entertaining and insightful, and as you already know, and as Donald Trump stated (another brash entertainer who happens to preside over a fairly large real estate empire) I'm of the belief that all trading at the higher levels is insider training of one form or another.

But there's nothing assumed about that observation. It's based on years of observation, research, and participation in the market. Many successful and educated people and even some famous investors share that view. They are not all even that wild.

As far as "evidence" is concerned., I think you should consider that the testimony of expert witnesses is taken as evidence in courts of law. You may not like Cramer (who cares about Cramer really) but you'd be wasting your time if you tried to say he isn't an acknowledged financial expert.

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 1:22am
Just for kicks

"just for kicks: what opinions are you referring to and what people (like Cramer) are you referring to?"

Let's take Dr. Dorn for instance, who you agreed with on market manipulation and Fannie/Freddie. Those who make sensationalist statements for which there is little/no evidence. People who link two events and claim that some association is obvious.

"Its a very easy position to assume because it requires no research, no original ideas and no creative thinking."

Look at one of my posts on Claire's religion thread. I offered a solution for allowing multiple beliefs to be displayed without government suppression or support of any belief. Feel free to criticize all you want; I will try to defend my idea. I won't take it personally, and I won't throw a fit. If you are going to post comments, you shouldn't be surprised to have your ideas challenged. That is the spirit of forums such as these. As for proof of my assertions, give me an example, and I will provide evidence. I have no problem with that.

Here's another. I feel the ones to blame for this crisis is government and the Fed; the free market would not have put us where we are now. The creation of Fannie and Freddie set these events into motion, and the Fed kept rates too low for too long, which planted the seeds of irrational risk taking. I don't think it was part of any collusion or plot to screw people over. Rather, I think government and the Fed intervened in the free market and (as usual) unintended consequences resulted.

"name calling, accusations, and stubborn attacks"

You need thicker skin. This isn't a church social. And by the way, I am pretty sure you started with the name calling instead of debating the facts.

"This, in and of itself, is a form of manipulation."

Yes it is, BUT IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET! You have been saying that manipulation is happening now with Fannie and Freddie.

"It's based on years of observation, research, and participation in the market. Many successful and educated people and even some famous investors share that view. "

I don't disagree; I have seen it too. There have been instances where suspicious trading activity has taken place before something is announced (example: Bear Stearns options on the Friday before the announcement), as if someone knew something. But you need evidence. Sometimes insiders trade on information, sometimes market volatility is all it is. But if you are going to assert that a particular event involves manipulation or insider trading, you should have some specific evidence to back it up. Why do you have such a problem with this?

blloyd Posted by blloyd on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 1:55pm
So you

have an opinion, just like everyone else

apparently though, you know a great deal more than "Dr" Dorn and other investment professionals. Why don't you write your own book on the market and put it out there for sale. The free market is calling.

Like I said, I think expert testimony is evidence (so do courts), I think my own observations are evidence, I even think my own intuition is evidence. If that's not enough for you, fine, I'm not trying to convince you.

But your tactics are classic ametuer O'Reilly. Calling claims you disagree with "wild" and "sensationalistic" when there's nothing remotely wild about any of them.

Since you're the master of proof, why don't you prove that Fannie and Freddie are not being manipulated . . .

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Tue, 08/26/2008 - 8:44pm
Opinions and evidence

"apparently though, you know a great deal more than "Dr" Dorn and other investment professionals."

No offense to the good Doctor, but she is not an investment professional. And by the way, investing and trading and writing about it does not make you an investment professional.

Expert testimony is important, as long as your experts are more than self-proclaimed experts. Cramer has some clout with some people, but why use him as an example if you are going to disparage him in other posts in the same thread!

"I think my own observations are evidence, I even think my own intuition is evidence."

Great! Let's here it! I have been asking for your so-called evidence, yet you continue to stall.

"Calling claims you disagree with "wild" and "sensationalistic" when there's nothing remotely wild about any of them."

Ok, then show me your evidence. Show me why I am wrong that your claims are wild and sensationalistic. Without evidence, anyone's assertion doesn't hold water.

"Since you're the master of proof, why don't you prove that Fannie and Freddie are not being manipulated . . ."

Give me a break. I am sure you have heard the axioms about how you cannot prove a negative and how the burden of proof is on the one making the assertion. I can't prove that Santa Claus doesn't exist either, so should I just believe in him?

As for a book, I doubt it would sell. It would be far too boring, since I have this aversion to sensationalism without evidence, and books without sensationalism usually don't do well.

blloyd Posted by blloyd on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 1:41pm
Sorry blloyd

not interested,

If you want to prove that Fannie and Freddie are not being manipulated feel free...........

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 9:18pm
That's pretty weak

We cannot have a substantive debate if you refuse to back up your assertions. I have called you out and you continue to hide. Weak.

blloyd Posted by blloyd on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 9:56am
There you go again

calling me weak still fails to arouse my interest in debating you on this topic, you haven't offered anything on it, just insisted that I prove my points to you

I'm as interested in trying to convince you of this as I am in mowing a stranger's lawn

I have nothing to gain from it except frustration -- and I'm not interested in converting you, go on with your generations old plan of a diversified portfolio and not timing the market, perhaps you will make some money..
----------------------------
Here are some links I think you should consider concerning the history of market tribulations and manipulations:

http://www.people.hbs.edu/ptufano/einfo/manipulations.pdf

this article discusses the techniques of market manipulation as they've been used over the past 300 years, they include the methods of spreading false rumors, and fake news (i.e. todays media strategy) along with inter company manipulations like false accounting. It also points out some fun examples of stock manipulations through internet techniques.

http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials/market_manipulation.html

Here's an article about a technique referred to as ramping, where enormously deep pocketed investors buy up shares as quickly as they are dumped to maintain a certain price point, ongoing in our current market, and I believe this is one of the publicly stated purposes of the "plunge protection team"

http://www.financialsense.com/Market/puplava/2003/0408.htm Heres another article providing a broad overview of manipulations
------------------------------------------

But here's a glaring observation: The stated purpose of the FED is to intervene into markets to control the credit, dollar supply and alter the value of currencies. How anyone could deny this textbook example of manipulation is beyond me.....

The Fed, as many know, is a private organization beholden to is shareholders --- so there you have it, market manipulation by a powerful few

At the end of the day, this is a "chicken or egg" debate similar to a creationist debate which is why a debate on it is fruitless. Just like every proof of God's existence is considered a non-proof by an atheist, every piece of evidence I provide for market manipulation can be called names by you like : circumstantial, weak, etc.

However, I doubt, even a doubter like yourself, can refute the Fed's role in manipulating the market

Now BE GONE!

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:22am
"...just insisted that I

"...just insisted that I prove my points to you"

It's called debating. If you can't handle getting called out, then maybe you should stick to something safer.

"go on with your generations old plan of a diversified portfolio and not timing the market, perhaps you will make some money..."

I have and I will, and so have countless other investors. Maybe you should consider it!

Your links show examples of how individual securities can be manipulated over the short term. Did I not state this myself in several posts? I mentioned the Bear Stearns example. But you cannot make the big assumption that it is happening now with Fannie, Freddie, or anything else UNTIL YOU HAVE EVIDENCE! And these are individual securities, not the entire market. If the markets are rigged, why have so many ordinary small investors made a lot of money just by maintaining a diversified portfolio over the long term? You are missing this boat.

"The Fed, as many know, is a private organization beholden to is shareholders..."

Wow, this shows how wrong you are!. The Fed is a quasi-government organization, neither completely public nor private. It was created by government and an independent agency. It does not have any shareholders! Who are these shareholders? What is the Fed's stock symbol? Where do you come up with this stuff???

blloyd Posted by blloyd on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 11:35am
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.