With the upcoming election the American people sleeping and awake are between a rock and a hard place of the economic calamity. The question is not which candidate is best for the people but which power elite monetary ideal will strike the final blow on our fiat economic empire?

I've been asked by many friends over the past several months which of the lesser of the two evils will be better for America and my answer is always the same...it doesn't matter. Neither represents sound economic policy as it relates to the American Individual. However, there are some differences on how to execute the Toxic Economic Plundering...

Socialism (Obama) - It is the aim of Socialism to transfer the means of production and wealth from private ownership to the ownership of organized society, to the State. The socialistic State owns all material factors of production and thus directs it. It rates the needs of each recipient based on state regulated factors thus forcing individuals to attain status not true to themselves resulting in loss of freedom.

or

State Corporatism (McCain) - While classical corporatism and its intellectual successor, neo-corporatism (and their critics) emphasize the role of corporate bodies in influencing government decision-making, corporatism used in the context of the study of authoritarian or autocratic states, usually refers to a process by which the state uses officially-recognized organizations as a tool for restricting public participation in the political process and limiting the power of civil society.

Both methods are a means to an end. But do either of these candidates really possess or advocate "true knowledge"? Of course not! What about those who do?

As the economy continues to be raped by the elite class a massive reaction is occuring with one "ISM" which is a very real factor and possibly a most powerful force as our American society has known Freedom and Liberty like no other...

Economic Individualism (Awake and dormant Americans) The doctrine of economic individualism holds that each individual should be allowed autonomy in making his or her own economic decisions as opposed to those decisions being made by the state, or the community, for him or her. Moreover, it often advocates the private ownership of property as opposed to state or collective arrangements. Though some argue these ideals are lost on the mass population, I propose that it may lay dormant with most Americans but - IT IS THERE!

Let's look at Individualism and US history

At the time of the formation of the United States, many of its citizens had fled from state, religious and economic oppression in Europe and were influenced by the egalitarian and fraternal ideals that later found expression in the French revolution. Such ideas influenced the framers of the U.S. Constitution (the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans) who believed that the government should seek to protect individual rights in the constitution itself; this idea later led to the Bill of Rights.

According to Ronald Scollon, the "fundamental American ideology of individualism" can be

1. The individual is the basis of all reality and all society.

2. The individual is defined by what he or she is not. American individualism emphasizes that the individual is not subject to arbitrary laws, and not subject to domination by historical precedent and preference

We are on the doorstep of a new movement with the unintended consequences of a free society being enslaved by the economic power elites.





The time has now come for an American Individual Rights Movement. What will this look like? Will the "Real Knowledge" and America's spirit prevail?




Paste this code into your site to promote this story!
    <a href="" onClick="document.images["breakTheMatrix"].src='http://www.breakthematrix.com/badge/badge.php?cid=28605';return false"><img name="breakTheMatrix" src="http://www.breakthematrix.com/badge/badge.php?cid=28605" border="0" /></a>