The Cure for Cancer: Part 2
Incase you missed part 1: http://www.breakthematrix.com/content/The-Cure-for-Cancer-Part-1
If anyone finds any inaccurate information in my posts, please leave me a private message and let me know so I can edit it. I'm always willing to correct information if it is wrong or out-dated.
Most of us know of the Pillsbury company. A few decades ago, they had PR consultant by the name of Fred Gates, who had a brilliant idea (this idea would later be known as the $Pillsbury Formula for Making Bread$). He proposed an advertising campaign in the form of a charity drive. He said all the company would need to do is offer a matched donation. So for example, if a citizen would give one dollar, Pillsbury would match that one dollar donation. (sound familiar?)
This kinda' thing seems benevolent at first, until you look at the benefits for the corporation. These charity drives, for schools, hospitals, etc, would have many people going door to door and having their own fund raisers (like bake sales n' such) on this company's behalf. The people raising funds would feel like they're now working as a team with the donating corporation. Each time they asked for a donation, they would also mention Pillsbury's name automatically because they're matching funds. This is a HUGE amount of volunteer advertising, for only HALF the cost, and ALL of the manpower comes at ZERO cost to Pillsbury. In the eyes of the public, they look like a great company that really cares about the people.
Anytime a company donates money, they'll get a large banner or plaque that has their company name and logo written across it for everyone to see. If you want an example, take for instance McDonalds. How long have they been associated with Children's Hospital? Anyone that does the research of what's really in their food, knows full well... that McDonalds can be held responsible for putting those kids in the hospital in the first place, along with many millions of adults because they won't get control of their eating habits. So they hospitalize the children, then donate (with your help of course) to children's hospital to try and bring them back to health, only to have them live longer to spend more money at McDonalds, all the while they look benevolent to a cash-spending, gluttonous public. Brilliant isn't it?
The strategy of these companies is, and has always been, to get back MORE than what they give away. I have to give it to these guys, they are quite brilliant. Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler, John Rockafeller... all very brilliant men. Being intelligent, as we can see, should not automatically be associated with truth, generousity, or kindness. The public is never made aware of what's really going on, and that certainly applies to the pharmacutical field.
John Rockafeller took notice of this idea (which G. Edward Griffin refers to as "Efficiency in Philanthropy"). He offered Gates consultant a LARGE salary, and said, "You're comin' to work for me." (figuratively speaking, that's not a quote) These corporate tycoons were, at the time, viewed poorly by the public. Many people knew these people were ruthless and had too much power and wealth for their own good, or the good of anyone else for that matter.
The Rockafellers are still major pharmacutical tycoons, among other things, and have been more many years since they merged into one of the largest cartels in the history of the world with families like the Carnegies and companies like I.G. Farben (IG = Interessengemeinschaft and stands for "Association of Common Interests"; our word for that is 'Cartel') who were originally a German dye company, then shifted to industrial chemicals, and then to pharmacuticals because there's much more profit to be had. The Rockafellers and the Farben company were so tightly knit, that I heard they used to describe it as a 'marriage'. If anyone finds that quote, let me know so I can post it here.
The pharmacutical companies then started to repeat this same process, but they would focus on medical schools. Many of these schools were great, but every school needs supplies, teachers, and equipment (colleges today operate no different than a corporate business). These major pharmacutical companies would offer this money as a donation at no return cost, but they asked only one thing in return. They would like to place one or two people from their company on the school's board of directors so they could monitor 'how their money was being spent'.
This was the beginning of how we became a country focused completely on pharmacutical drugs being the 'end-all cure' to everything. You now have the pharmacutical companies running a school training doctors to do what? Prescribe drugs to all their patients. Many of these schools needed the money desperately, and when someone comes along and offers your school two million dollars and all they want is a representative of the company, who is well known and prestigious, to have a seat on your board, your answer is, "Yes, we would be honored to have them in our board of directors."
All of the now-known major medical universities in the country today received large sums of donated money from these corporations and accepted the corporate-interest board members on to their staff. As a result of the funds, they were able to repair and build new structures, hire the best teachers in the country, and add state-of-the-art equipment to their campus. However, in the process, they shifted the entire focus of the medical students to pharmacutical drugs.
This is how the entire process of medical education was taken over in this country, and it is shocking to see how little money it really took to do it. I will quote from Adolf Hitler: "If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough, and often enough, the people will believe it." and "They are more likely to believe a big lie, than a small one."
American doctors honestly think they're doing the right thing. They're not purposefully withholding the truth from you, and you can see this because many doctors get sick as well. But let me put it to you this way, let's say you are a Ph.D in medical science. You have spent 8 years in the best schools and internships learning what is said to be the best medical science in the world, and now have been practicing medicine for years and own your own practice. You've been treating cancer patients half your life, and I (without the same rigorous medical training you've gone through) come along out of nowhere and tell you, I have the cure for cancer growing on a tree in my backyard.
How inclined are you to believe me?
The doctor has paid a large sum of money to get a great education, but the average doctor knows little to nothing about nutrition. Their wives generally know more about nutrition than they do. If you go to the doctor, 9 times out of 10, you'll probably walk out with a prescription because that's what the doctor has been trained to do.
Three reasons the cure has been supressed: Manipulation, Ignorance, and Pride... and all 3 stem from one root: Money. Money cannot be evil, it doesn't have a conscience. However, 1 Tim 6:10 tells us --
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
So what happened to Laetrile and why have you probably not heard of it?
Congressman John Kelsey used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the minutes of the board of directors of Sloane Kettering dated July 2, 1974. The minutes said, "Sloan Kettering is not enthusiastic about studying Amygdalin, but would like to study cyanide releasing drugs." That should easily explain the situation. They don't want to find the cure. They want to find a cure/temporarily solution that THEY CAN MARKET! Anything that comes from nature cannot be patented. This struggle has not about your health, it's about their desire for more power, wealth, and control.
In the mid 70s, there was a large outcry concerning the effectiveness of Laetrile. The studies on Laetrile had been silenced by Dr. Henry Garland and Dr. E. M. McDonald of the California Medical Association’s Cancer Advisory Commission, who ended up lying about misleading information on the actual 1953 California study. The media accepted what they were told by these two doctors because they were well known. However, these same two doctors were the SAME DOCTORS who reported to the public, "A pack (of cigarettes) a day, keeps lung cancer away."
A large movement began to rise in the mid 1970s to push that Laetrile does work, and the positive results are overwhelming.
So to prove Laetrile either way, once and for all, the lab testing was taken to Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura. In 1975, Dr. Sugiura was, and had been for some years, one of the most respected cancer research scientists at the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and well known for laboratory tests around the world. In working with laetrile on cancerous mice, Dr. Sugiura came to five conclusions:
At the end of the California Report, it states, "Dr. Sugiura has never observed complete regression of these tumors in all his cosmic experience with other kemotheraputic agents." This is a clear result that Laetrile does work after all.
So what happened after it was proven to work?
John D. Rockafeller Sr and JD Rockafeller II, began donating money to Sloan-Kettering in 1927, and even donated the plot of land the building stands on today. During the Laetrile trials, there were three Rockafellers on the board of directors for Sloan-Kettering: James, Laurence and William. By now you can guess that the results from the study did not please the Rockafellers because they couldn't patent Laetrile.
I think G Edward Griffin puts it best when he talks about the drug tests done by private companies. They'll spend millions of dollars testing the saftey and ethics of a drug. If something found in nature is not patentable, what company would spend 20 million dollars on testing its saftey and ethics? Not to mention that the FDA says it's illegal to use until it's tested. It all starts to make sense at this point. No company will EVER spend the money for a test on something that comes from nature. Therefore, NO NATURAL REMEDY will ever be government approved 'safe'.
These people are LYING to us. Period. It may be hard to believe that everything we think we know is wrong, but when you 'follow the yellow brick road', you'll find that it was just a pathetic little man pulling all the strings. They've fooled everyone. They're willing to sacrifice the lives of you and your family to make a buck. They get honored at award ceremonies... and they're murderers.
And now to end this article, I want to state my purpose in writing this. My heart is sickened with hurt every time I hear someone say, "Oh my (insert relative) has cancer." I'm informing everyone of this cure so that you can go out to help and inform everyone you know. If you don't do anything else, at least send them a link to the two articles I've written, so perhaps they can help themselves and begin to do research on their own. There's enough information on this one topic to write a series of books, but this can get them started. Just copy and paste this into an email:
http://www.breakthematrix.com/content/The-Cure-for-Cancer-Part-1
http://www.breakthematrix.com/content/The-Cure-for-Cancer-Part-2
A couple of common questions:
I hope this helps, and will add a recommended book list on the end of this for anyone that wants to do the research. (I'll edit in more over time, I have to go now :)
- kainestolkyn's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 77 reads
****