Law School Dean Calls Conference to Plan Bush War Crimes Prosecution
Posted by Matt Sistrunk on Sat, 07/12/2008 - 18:00 in Posted Jun 17, 2008, 06:51 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The dean of Massachusetts School of Law at Andover is planning a September conference to map out war crimes prosecutions, and the targets are President Bush and other administration officials.
The dean, Lawrence Velvel, says in a statement that “plans will be laid and necessary organizational structures set up, to pursue the guilty as long as necessary and, if need be, to the ends of the Earth."
Other possible defendants, he said, include federal judges and John Yoo, the former Justice Department official who wrote one of the so-called torture memos.
“We must insist on appropriate punishments,” he continued, “including, if guilt is found, the hangings visited upon top German and Japanese war criminals in the 1940s."
Velvel elaborates in an introduction to a series of articles published in The Long Term View (PDF). He writes “there is no question” that Bush and other officials are guilty of the federal crime of conspiracy to commit torture.
He also criticizes Justice Department officials for their legal memos. “The DOJ lawyers who wrote the corrupt legal memos giving attempted cover to Bush's actions have been rewarded by federal judgeships, cabinet positions, and high falutin' professorships,” he writes. Yoo is a professor at the University of California-Berkeley law school, while another former Justice Department official who signed a Yoo memo, Jay Bybee, is a judge on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Velvel tears into President Bush as well, writing: “The man ultimately responsible for the torture had a unique preparation and persona for the presidency: he is a former drunk, was a serial failure in business who had to repeatedly be bailed out by daddy's friends and wanna-be-friends, was unable to speak articulately despite the finest education(s) that money and influence can buy, has a dislike of reading, so that 100-page memos have to be boiled down to one page for him, is heedless of facts and evidence, and appears not even to know the meaning of truth.”
A Wall Street Journal editorial published today stands in stark contrast to Velvel’s criticism. It assails House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers for issuing subpoenas seeking information about the possible torture of Sept. 11 suspects. The editorial mentions the testimony of British professor Philippe Sands, who also contends U.S. officials are guilty of war crimes.
“Nearly seven years after 9/11, the U.S. homeland hasn't been struck again and American civil liberties remain intact,” the newspaper writes. “So how does Congress say ‘thank you’? By trying to ruin the men who in good faith set the legal rules that have kept us safe.”
The Long Term View: A Journal of Informed Opinion - Here is more information from the law professor who is finding a way to prosecute George W. Bush for war crimes: http://www.mslaw.edu/MSLMedia/LTV/6.4.pdf
- Flag as offensive
- Login or register to post comments
- 198 reads
Subscribe to this thread






****
I would strongly defend Bush for going after the Taliban after the 9/11 attacks (assuming they really were responsible, I am not convinced either way on who was behind that) but everything he has done since has been illegal, immoral, un-American and just plain stupid. Justifying torture is wrong. taking over and occupying a foreign country you don't like just because you can is wrong. Threatening another foreign country for the same reason is wrong.
These wars of aggression are wrong and are hurting our nation as much as the Bush-proclaimed enemy. The billions spent keeping troops in countries around the world is completely unjustifiable and is causing serious economic hurt to the entire nation. I do believe we need to maintain a military capable of simultaneously laying waste to two thirds of the world if we are attacked, then we need to keep them home where they belong and ready in case anyone is stupid enough to attack us. This could be done with a smaller, highly trained and incredibly well equipped standing army and much more extensive use of well trained National Guard.
Bring on the charges! I hope they stick.
Pat
...and it's about time for someone to indict George W. Bush for murder, or war crimes, or both. Thank you Mr. Velvel and Mr. Bugliosi. Other high profile men of honor need to step up right now and tell the truth about this criminal president. Anyone still bent on shielding him from prospecution is definitely too brainwashed by the current partisan political paradigm to objectively look at truth. They are still in denial, and will remain that way until in a futile attempt to save some thread of credibility, mainstream media are forced to report the very newsworthy developments regarding this new legal trend, to hold a U.S. President totally accountable for his crimes.
The lack of people in positions of power that are unable or unwilling to take on this administration has been disheartening.
I'm glad he is speaking out and moving forward to prosecute within the law. He should expect to have his computer and phones monitored, his car followed, and some harassment from the SS!
Good luck Velvel!
And sooner or later, something is going to stick. This... together with Kucinich's 35 Articles of Impeachment, together with 911 family lawsuits against the airlines, and the airlines in turn going after the administration. Sooner or later....
It's beyond me why nobody has been able to tackle Bush. Thanks for this post. I hope this one sticks!
_________________
Freedom is an inside job