Some people have intimated that we should strive to be less associated with the finge conspiracy theory nuts and more acceptable in circles of main stream thinkers; confining our discourse to a circumscribed box that has been defined by decades of rhetoric propagated through the main stream media outlets. In other words, some people seem to think that, in order to gain mass apaeal, we should kowtow to the Matrix.

As I have already stated in the Forums, I believe this approach would be antithetical to our purpose and exactly what those who endeavor to keep the Matrix in place would want. Make no mistake, there are people who would willingly give their lives to stop the dismantling of the Matrix, but, as of now, they're not too worried. They don't believe it can be done. There are powerful psycological prohibitions in place to prevent it.

A great deal of time and effort has been spent constructing mental cages for us from which, until recently, many of us have been not simply unable, but unwilling to escape. Within the cage, we are in our comfort zone. It's familiar. It's dependable. It's the only thing most of us have ever known, but it's a lie.

Ron Paul has done more than any other person alive to rattle that cage and wake some of us up. Now, many of us have determined to Break the Matrix. In order to do that we must, first, try and understand the Matrix. To be effective in it's deconstruction, we have to be willing to search out it's vectors (compartments), it's angles, it's vertices (connections) and it's boundries (limitations). We can't go on pretending it doesn't exist; being afraid to explore the depths of the rabbit hole (wherever it leads).

I have made many unsubstantiated claims here that some of you can feel are right and some of you will just bemoan as another reason we are rejected by those who presume to know and dictate what is socially acceptable and what is not.

After some consideration, I've decide to focus on presenting a series of articles that will direct substantial bright substantiating sunlight on the Matrix, exposing it's progenitors and their designs.

I fully expect to be ignored and lampooned much in the same way the plethora of previously assembled irrefutable proof, information and documentation has been, time and time again, in some cases for decades, but I'll present it nevertheless.

Now, I'm not much of a writer. In fact, I hate writing. Besides, much of what I intend to present has already been written down by professional researchers and writers who are much more adept and proficient at it than I am. For the most part, beginning next week, I will be presenting the works of some of those who I have been studying over the last 33 years.

Don't say you haven't been warned.

God bless,
Nick