Documentaries are fascinating. Like the one showing those awful Israelis deliberately killing Muhammad Al Dura, a child in his father's arms.... until the documentary producers, France2 and its Palestenian collaborators got exposed in court for the extensive editing they did. That no Israeli fired toward the child but that the child was killed by Palestenian bullets didn't get any media because it wasn't nearly as interesting as the documentary version.

Or that documentary that was filmed in Jenin showing the body of an Israeli-massacred Palestinian being carried by the victim's friends who were crying and screaming revenge againt Israel.... until an Israeli helicopter flew overhead and the noise frightened the pole-bearers who dropped the coffin to the ground and ran away, including the dearly-departed who came out of the coffin and joined his friends.

To check out the voracity of Arab-produced documentaries and other pearls of wisdom from assorted terrorists, murderers and their clerics:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/

http://www.honestreporting.com/

Also - this may be of interest:

AlJazeera Interviews the Israeli Professor Mordechai Kedar

http://youtube.com/watch?v=VHpMhAzj-Tk

I believe that peace in the middle east will not come from any politician or rulers of kingdoms but from individuals getting to know each other and working together.

After getting a slight jolt seeing McCain ads and posting the above messages, I did more reading on the site and realized that it was not that simple. Censoring and banning the opposing view is not an option especially for a group that believes and tries to promote 'limited government'.

This was a good experience in the debate over freedom of expression and censoring rules, and I suggest : 1. provide a full forum topic on this issue and develop a mature debate on it
and 2. in the FAQ (awesome that this question tops the list!) provide a more deep answer (like Trevor's comments regarding banning) and provide links to the forum threads that discusses this issue.

(and maybe 3: develop the ideas that relate 'money is money' to 'honest money' (differentiates between kinds of money!) which might lead to an ad policy that doesn't shun the opposing view but rather makes the 'opposing view holders' pay with 'honest money' (which in turn makes them earn that honest money through work which actualizes the libertarian view!!)

comprender? sometimes I confuse myself!

Thank you windy for a quick reply,

I have a feeling that talking to google might be useful.. they might be able to tweak the algorithm so there is some discrimination in what ads come through... I wonder who should be taking care of this stuff..

It does seem quite unfortunate and 'confusing' to have McCain ads finance (via google) a site about honest money, Liberty and non intervention!

Why do I always see a McCain poster on this site? Is it a trick or has this site received money to promote this warmonger