A human rights crime- by Jimmy Carter

Submitted by:
benton1967
benton1967



Subscribe to this Author

Paste this code into your site to promote this story!


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/08/israelandthepalestinians
Type of Content: 
Article

Jimmy Carter
The Guardian,
Thursday May 8 2008

The world is witnessing a terrible human rights crime in Gaza, where a million and a half human beings are being imprisoned with almost no access to the outside world. An entire population is being brutally punished.

This gross mistreatment of the Palestinians in Gaza was escalated dramatically by Israel, with United States backing, after political candidates representing Hamas won a majority of seats in the Palestinian Authority parliament in 2006. The election was unanimously judged to be honest and fair by all international observers.

Israel and the US refused to accept the right of Palestinians to form a unity government with Hamas and Fatah and now, after internal strife, Hamas alone controls Gaza. Forty-one of the 43 victorious Hamas candidates who lived in the West Bank have been imprisoned by Israel, plus an additional 10 who assumed positions in the short-lived coalition cabinet.

Regardless of one's choice in the partisan struggle between Fatah and Hamas within occupied Palestine, we must remember that economic sanctions and restrictions on the supply of water, food, electricity and fuel are causing extreme hardship among the innocent people in Gaza, about one million of whom are refugees.

Israeli bombs and missiles periodically strike the area, causing high casualties among both militants and innocent women and children. Prior to the highly publicised killing of a woman and her four children last week, this pattern had been illustrated by a report from B'Tselem, the leading Israeli human rights organisation, which stated that 106 Palestinians were killed between February 27 and March 3. Fifty-four of them were civilians, and 25 were under 18 years of age.

On a recent trip through the Middle East, I attempted to gain a better understanding of the crisis. One of my visits was to Sderot, a community of about 20,000 in southern Israel that is frequently struck by rockets fired from nearby Gaza. I condemned these attacks as abominable acts of terrorism, since most of the 13 victims during the past seven years have been non-combatants.

Subsequently, I met with leaders of Hamas - a delegation from Gaza and the top officials in Damascus. I made the same condemnation to them, and urged that they declare a unilateral ceasefire or orchestrate with Israel a mutual agreement to terminate all military action in and around Gaza for an extended period.

They responded that such action by them in the past had not been reciprocated, and they reminded me that Hamas had previously insisted on a ceasefire throughout Palestine, including Gaza and the West Bank, which Israel had refused. Hamas then made a public proposal of a mutual ceasefire restricted to Gaza, which the Israelis also rejected.

There are fervent arguments heard on both sides concerning blame for a lack of peace in the Holy Land. Israel has occupied and colonised the Palestinian West Bank, which is approximately a quarter the size of the nation of Israel as recognised by the international community. Some Israeli religious factions claim a right to the land on both sides of the Jordan river, others that their 205 settlements of some 500,000 people are necessary for "security".

All Arab nations have agreed to recognise Israel fully if it will comply with key United Nations resolutions. Hamas has agreed to accept any negotiated peace settlement between the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and Israel's prime minister, Ehud Olmert, provided it is approved in a referendum of the Palestinian people.

This holds promise of progress, but despite the brief fanfare and positive statements at the peace conference last November in Annapolis, the process has gone backwards. Nine thousand new Israeli housing units have been announced in Palestine; the number of roadblocks within the West Bank has increased; and the stranglehold on Gaza has been tightened.

It is one thing for other leaders to defer to the US in the crucial peace negotiations, but the world must not stand idle while innocent people are treated cruelly. It is time for strong voices in Europe, the US, Israel and elsewhere to speak out and condemn the human rights tragedy that has befallen the Palestinian people.

· Jimmy Carter, a former president of the United States, is founder of The Carter Center project-syndicate.org

Read »

Created 13 weeks 6 days ago
Made popular 13 weeks 5 days ago

Comments

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Yo,

Travelling to the Sudan was courageous but travelling to Palestine makes him a coward? That's certainly a major effort to do something cowardly. I mean he could've stayed at home and watched American Idol or played freeze tag with his secret service guards.

It looks to me like you dissaprove of Hamas and are extending that dissaproval to Carter because he met with them.

I don't think solving the Palestine conflict would lead to a global ceasefire but I think it would help diffuse a lot of the tension and anger that is fueling a lot of strife. Even if it only solved the Palestinian situation that would be major.

Anyway, it's clear to me that Carter is an agent of peace and makes quite an effort. You listed a whole bunch of problems involving Muslims --- Carter is working on one of them.

Even if you disagree with his statements how can you not respect a man who is spending his golden years lobbying the world for peace when he could just as easily be popping viagra in Thailand with a room full of... well, .........

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Sun, 05/25/2008 - 01:10
Ha!

Good points particularly that last one.

I don't think it is right for Carter to meet with Hamas without preconditions, meaning he needs to use the stage to challenge violence and repression in all its forms. To let Hamas use the visit of an ex president to garner support, and by extension methods, is wrong. Hamas is hardly a group of choir boys. Courage would have been to call out Hamas to renounce terror and renounce dihmmi tax and the imposition of Sharia law.

We all should realize that if you ever want to see the diametrically opposed ideology to the one we are promoting within The Revolution or Freedom movement it is Sharia Law practiced in radical forms!

I really am not to sure why people keep voting me down. If you have a problem with the facts/ideas I present point them out. Don't just click on the down arrow. I prefer to look at the truth in its entirety. Specifically just because the neocons are wrong on preemptive war does not mean that speaking out against Islamist violence worldwide is wrong people.

See, AdamAdamR, he has the guts to talk like an adult.

Yo

Our time is NOW.

Commander_Yo Posted by Commander_Yo on Sun, 05/25/2008 - 02:43
Clicks

I don't see the point of these downclicks. If a post is pointlessly mean and offensive,
I might downclick, but not if I simply disagree. I've upclicked on well presented points
I disagree with. Disagreements often arise purely from differing opinions as to the
facts of some issue. Weak and ill considered points I generally ignore, unless I can
add something constructive.

This Gaza thing is really horrible. The salient points to me are that they were denied
a cease fire, and that the Gazans are effectively imprisoned. I can't condone either
just because I loathe sharia law. This is genocide, pure and simple.

bobo Posted by bobo on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 01:28
How would you feel if

a former leader of a Muslim country came here and lectured us on the evils of our tax system. (Might be interesting) The tax code of a democtatically elected gov't is the concern of the gov't and the constituents that have to pay the tax. It's not Carter's business to get involved-- imho.

Carter is trying to rectify what he, and many others, see as a tremendous injustice that is leading to global strife. He's not trying to move to Palestine -- so I don't think he needs to be concerned about what his status might be if he lived there.

Also, you can't fix hypothetical problems. There is a very real problem in Palestine and Carter is trying to fix that. If a new oppressor sprung up and filled the void of most pressing political problem on Earth then I'm sure Carter would hop back on a plane and see if he could help.

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Sat, 05/24/2008 - 21:44
If the Palestine problem was

If the Palestine problem was solved tomorrow would Islamist driven Genocide in the Sudan end? Would Somlia be peaceful? Would Islamists in Kashmir give up their weapons? Would Islamist in southern Thailand renounce violence? Would the Taliban rebuild the 2000 year old Buddhist statue they blew up? The Palestine problem is only one aspect of the global strife you speak of and is far from the root cause of Islamist violence worldwide.

A historical study of Islamic conquest would quickly reveal how vast and extensive Islamist driven war has been. No offense AdamAdamR but to say that the Palestine/Israeli problem is responsible for leading Islamist global strife is foolish. Also to say that Carter should not be concerned with the stated objective of Hama to persecute and repress people because he is not there is a non sequitur.

Carter was courageous when he went to the Sudan for sure.

Yo

Our time is NOW.

Commander_Yo Posted by Commander_Yo on Sun, 05/25/2008 - 00:13
yea yo but on the same note

If you and I want to truly look into study of American conquest the story is much bigger, the amount of coups and military actions that the U.S. has backed since the 50's is huge. -heck we could go back to 1900- and the up to 1 million Philippians (in a little known war), that died.

We have been sponsoring military coups, "regime change", and military actions in EVERY corner of the world.

If you truly want to look into what has happened in Sudan one needs to dig deeper than saying it is the Islamists.

U.N. resolutions (and there have been lots of them) condemning Israels actions have been many, many are just vetoed by the US

To truly look at what Israel has done to the Palestinians is appalling, to look at the history and where the violence has come from is appalling. To look at what Israel has done in Lebanon is appalling.

and then to look further into it on this side of the ocean, when we look to the Israeli lobby (one of the biggest) when we look to how many folks in this current "regime" of ours have duel citizenship with Israel, when we look to the amount of money and military support the U.S. has given to Israel something is most truly out of balance.

Every corner of our MSM has shown one side of this, including "our history books".

To suggest that the solving of the Palestinian Crisis would ease most of the tension in the middle east, is not foolish.

But we in our support of Israel have only made the mess much bigger.

Im not saying that there are not violent or radical Muslims, but your comment seems to follow the "partyline" that the Muslims are the spooks and terrorists of the world.

We can name Hamas or Hezbollah terrorists, but "we" continue to sponsor state driven terrorism in Israel and the globe over.

THE HUMANITARIAN CRISIS OF THE PALESTINIANS, is a real thing, kept out of the view of our citizens, there will not be peace in the middle east until we can find a solution.

(Utah is bigger than Israel, lets give it to them-

and have Israel here,

that would be a great solution.)

benton1967 Posted by benton1967 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 19:48
Hamas is evil

The facts are that they are the democratically elected government. Do we only recognize democratically elected government we approve of? Nonetheless Jimmy Carter, as a born again Christian, would do well to remember that he would live as a second class citizen in the Islamic State that Hamas wants across the whole region.

From:
http://www.slate.com/id/2135098/

"It contained an interview with the leader of the Hamas group on the Bethlehem City Council, who announced his party's intention to impose the al-Jeziya as soon as it was strong enough to do so. This is the tax, sometimes called the dhimmi or "unbeliever" tax, that is levied on all those who will not profess that there is one god and that Mohammed is his messenger. Aside from the offensiveness of this, imagine the opportunities for Ottoman-style corruption that it affords."

So to me, Jimmy Carter supporting exchanging one oppressor for another oppressor, who would force people with his identical beliefs into a second class citizenship, is profoundly one sided, even cowardly. If Jimmy Carter was truly a courageous and noble person seeking to elevate human rights he would ask the leaders of Hamas to renounce Dhimmitude and other Human rights robbing laws in the Islamist movement. That is courage, that is the whole truth.

Lets see Jimmy Carter write about both sides of the story. That is where the real courage lies.

Yo

Our time is NOW.

Commander_Yo Posted by Commander_Yo on Sat, 05/24/2008 - 15:44
Jimmy Carter is really very brave

and committed He could easily travel the college circuit, collecting 6 figures for an hour long improvised speech on whatever he happened to be thinking about -- and partying with the coeds in the meantime (read Bill Clinton)

Instead he travels the globe trying to promote peace in dangerous lands, he speaks out against our current administration, he writes books

And still he receives no respect in the media. How can you not respect this man? The people attacking Jimmy Carter are the closest thing to "un-american" that I've ever seen.

Has anyone else heard his speech on oil dependency in the 70's? (it would be great to find that on youtube) Something about how we needed to wean ourselves off the middle eastern crude. Not very politically popular but bold nonetheless. Perhaps our country should've heeded his advice thirty years ago. Why not listen to him now?

AdamAdamR Posted by AdamAdamR on Sat, 05/24/2008 - 03:39
Watching all the things he has done...

with his time after his administration, I must say that I believe he may be the most admirable president of our time.

benton1967 Posted by benton1967 on Sat, 05/24/2008 - 09:57
two reads and already

and someone has already voted this down one

It would be nice if people who feel the need to lower the vote on something had to write a comment on why they think something is not good.

benton1967 Posted by benton1967 on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 10:14
another perceived injustice

really, what's with this whining? is this the metrosexual thing i heard about? for men to whine and cry and complain?

awesomo5000 Posted by awesomo5000 on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 18:55
oh what a pleasent surprise,

nice to see you again my friend swarelis, you add joy to my day and are so very helpful in your insights
thanks for adding so much to the BTW revolution.

you prove yourself by your words.

benton1967 Posted by benton1967 on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 21:41
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.