House Approves New Property Seizure Law
House Approves New Property Seizure Law
|
Submitted by: rea1001.blogspot.com ![]() Subscribe to this Author |
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=8997
Type of Content: Article House Approves New Property Seizure Law The criminals in the federal government are now trying to legalize the seizure of computers and other property under the guise of strengthening intellectual property laws. HR 4279 or the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 which was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, will give the government draconian powers to do just this. This legislation gives the government the power to seize property that facilitates the violation of intellectual property laws. The legislation also mandates the formation of a formal Intellectual Property Enforcement Division within the office of the Deputy Attorney General to enforce this madness. In addition, a new office called the Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Representative is created within the Executive Office of the President. If you boil it down to brass tax, this legislation allows the U.S. government to lawfully seize your computer if it has one unauthorized mp3 file on its hard drive. It also provides the authorization for the creation of offices within the executive branch to enforce a law that is impossible to enforce. Below is taken from section 202 of HR 4279 that gives the federal government the authorization to seize property that may have been used to facilitate an intellectual property violation. The language in this section indicates that a violation would include downloading a single unauthorized mp3 file on to a computer. d) Unauthorized Recording of Motion Pictures- Section 2319B(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: `(b) Forfeiture and Destruction; Restitution- `(1) CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS- (A) The following property is subject to forfeiture to the United States: `(i) Any copies of a motion picture or other audiovisual work protected under title 17 that are made without the authorization of the copyright owner. `(ii) Any property constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of a violation of subsection (a). `(iii) Any property used, or intended to be used, to commit or facilitate the commission of a violation of subsection (a) that is owned or predominantly controlled by the violator or by a person conspiring with or aiding and abetting the violator in committing the violation, except that property is subject to forfeiture under this clause only if the Government establishes that there was a substantial connection between the property and the violation of subsection (a). This is the 1980s equivalent of the government being given the legal authority to seize cassette recorders if they were used in recording a song off of the radio. Under this legislation, downloading even a single mp3 file unauthorized by the copyright owner will give the federal government the power to take your computer. There is no way that the federal government can enforce this. In fact, it is insane that the U.S. House of Representatives is more concerned about keeping the record and movie industry happy by passing this legislation than they are with real issues. Incredibly, this bill was passed by a vote of 410-11. Two of the dissenting voters included Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. John Conyers a fascist and anti-Constitutionalist member of the U.S. House of Representatives who originally introduced this bill made the following statements describing the purpose of the legislation. His statements were republished in a Billboard Magazine report. (1) prioritize intellectual property protection to the highest level of our government; (2) make changes to IP law to enhance the ability of IP owners to effectively enforce their rights; (3) make it easier to criminally prosecute repeat offenders; (4) increase penalties for IP violations that endanger public health and safety. Basically speaking, Conyers believes that downloading illegal mp3 and movie files endanger public health and safety. Conyers is either an insane individual that belongs in a mental institution for making such a ridiculous statement or he and everybody else who voted for this bill is in the back pockets of the RIAA, the MPAA and the rest of the music and movie industry. Common sense would dictate that such a law is unenforceable and should have not been seriously entertained. This is just another sign that this country is run by a bunch of fascists who are trying to find as many ways to undermine civil liberties under the guise of enforcing the law. What is really ridiculous about this, is the fact that the Constitution which is the supreme law of the land is violated by these fascist tyrants in Congress every single day of the week. If they were actually serious about enforcing the law, why are they not following the Constitution? Why do they reject it? Maybe if the movie and music industry stopped putting out horrible content, their sales would be a little better. It seems as if they are trying to blame people who download unauthorized mp3 and movie files for their shortcomings in business. Perhaps they should do what smaller independent music and film production companies have done and embrace the technological revolution instead of stifling it by trying to push this anti-American legislation down our throats. It is understandable to go after people who are illegally profiting off of selling material that isn’t their own but there really isn’t a need for government involvement. The record industry should sue those people if they believe that there are groups or individuals who are unfairly profiting off of their work. A court can decide if the claims they present are valid. However, to give powers to an already corrupt government to seize private property from people who are violating copyright laws by merely having downloaded mp3 files or movie files on their computer is unenforceable and beyond the scope of government. Section 301 of the bill establishes the Office of the United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Representative and section 501 of the bill establishes the Intellectual Property Enforcement Division within the Department of Justice under the office of the Deputy Attorney General. These particular offices will be established to serve as the enforcement arm for this legislation. How many more powers is this corrupt legislature going to give to a renegade executive branch that is already engaging in perpetual war, setting up a police state, authorizing torture, destroying national sovereignty and other horrors? The federal government is full of petty bureaucrats and tyrants that can’t do anything right to begin with, and the U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to expand government again through this legislation. With 410 of these tyrants voting for this legislation, it is doubtful that we will be successful in defeating this bill in the U.S Senate or if it goes to the dictator in chief. Read »
Created 10 weeks 4 days ago
Made popular 10 weeks 3 days ago |
- Flag as offensive
- Login or register to post comments
- 184 reads






Great post!
Great job!
Isn't there already laws in place to protect intellectual property? I certainly don't think they are going to be federal agents seizing all computers and arresting everyone that has shared movies or music. They may as well throw everyone in jail.
The fact that these laws are so broadly written as that it effects almost everyone in the country is a problem. I think the legislation is more aimed at people that mass produce cd's and movies and then try and sell them. I have heard that there are even websites that you can watch just released movies such as Iron Man or Speed Racer (loved em both :)). This should be stopped, but from what I have heard these sites are not located in this country, so there is not much we can do.
Honestly, I wouldn't get paranoid about this. You now see many bands openly promoting the sharing of there music cause it expands their base and gets people to go to there concerts where they make most of their money. The movie thing is a bit different. All we could hope is that good judgment is used in applying the law, which I see as necessary and that they don't start arresting 13 yr old girls who have downloaded 3000 songs cause their parents don't watch them or they have nothing better to do.
Do you remember what happened to Napster? http://www.wired.com/gadgets/portablemusic/news/2001/10/47296
This looks like another way to go after people for sharing files. As icing on the cake, they get to confiscate private property under the pretense of protecting intellectual property rights, which as you have stated, are already protected under current law. More control, more police state in action. They will not arrest the 13 year old girls, they will arrest and fine their parents, as well as confiscate their property, because they are responsible for their child's actions.
Even if they do not go after everyone, they will get to pick and choose whom they will target. Hmmmm... somehow I get the feeling that the people they target will be people who download things they don't want us to see. Not being paranoid or anything, but after the Monsanto video disappeared from Google Video due to a supposed "copyright" issue, anything can happen.
Localize yourself!
Barbara H. Peterson
www.survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com
are likely to be selectively enforced, just like McCain-Feingold. I am hoping that this and other laws can be repealed if enough people object.
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone; and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.--John Quincy Adams