Wall Street Journal: Paul Camp, Liberals Unite On Spy Bill

Submitted by:
shelly
shelly



Subscribe to this Author

Paste this code into your site to promote this story!


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121443403835305037.html
Type of Content: 
Article

FISA Fight Creates Coalition
Of Liberal Blogs, Paul Voters
By AMY SCHATZ
June 25, 2008 7:03 p.m.

WASHINGTON -- The fight over immunity for telecom companies in domestic-spying legislation is creating an unexpected side effect: unity among liberal bloggers and Ron Paul supporters.

Liberal activists and supporters of the Texas Republican and former presidential candidate plan to join forces Thursday and begin a "money bomb" protest of lawmakers who support telecom immunity in the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act. During a "money bomb," grassroots activists donate money during a short period of time -- usually a day -- to create buzz and raise money for their candidate.

The effort is timed to coincide with a planned Senate vote on the bill. Libertarians and liberal activists have blasted Democratic lawmakers, including presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, for supporting the legislation.

Both groups are upset about a provision in the bill that would provide retroactive immunity from civil actions for telecom companies alleged to have provided information to the government as part of its secret, warrantless wiretapping program. The House passed the legislation on June 20 and a Senate vote could come as soon as Thursday.

"There's entrenched power in Washington that protects itself and there are people on both sides who don't feel like they're having their rights protected," says Jane Hamsher, one of the organizers behind the effort and founder of the popular Democratic blog Firedoglake. "It's really about right and left coming together to fight the entrenched power and take their power away."

The fund-raiser represents a novel partnership between the two groups, which have separately proven themselves adept at organizing activists and readers to take action. If it goes well, organizers say it could mark the beginning of a more far-reaching partnership between the two groups, which agree on issues from ending the Iraq war to protection of civil liberties.

"For us, it's a natural alliance," says Trevor Lyman of BreaktheMatrix.com, and one of the organizers behind the famous Ron Paul "money bombs" which stunned the political establishment by raising about $14 million total for the Texas congressman's now-suspended presidential campaign.

"When it comes to civil liberties, we're absolutely aligned" with liberal activists, he says, although he notes the two groups remain far apart on other matters such as economic issues. "We stand so closely on this issue."

Mr. Paul missed the recent House vote on the domestic-spying legislation but later released a statement that he "strongly opposed every previous FISA overhaul attempt and I certainly would have voted against this one as well."

Discussions between the liberal bloggers and Mr. Paul's supporters for a joint venture only began about a week ago, but took off as anger about the telecom immunity increased in both communities. The two groups agreed to form a bipartisan political action committee, Accountability Now, and to use the Democratic fund-raising site ActBlue.com to handle the paperwork involved in legally processing political donations.

Beginning Thursday, blogs associated with both groups plan to begin plugging the joint-fundraising effort, asking their readers to pledge donations for the "money bomb" event.

Organizers say they'd like to raise "as much as possible," perhaps several million dollars, during their one-day "money bomb," which is likely to be held in August. They say they're not yet sure what they'd do with proceeds from the fund-raiser. Most likely it will be used to fund advertisements against Democratic and Republican lawmakers who supported the warrantless wiretapping legislation. It would also likely be used to fund ads supporting congressional challengers who are against the bill.

Write to Amy Schatz at Amy.Schatz@wsj.com

Read »

Created 1 year 32 weeks ago
Made popular 1 year 32 weeks ago

Comments

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
RE:

Paul proposed term limit legislation multiple times,
Livescores---
football live score---
soccer live score---
wimbledon live scores---
live cricket score

Posted by MattHardy on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 5:59am
It might be said that the

It might be said that the protection of civil liberties is a key responsibility of all citizens of free states, as distinct from authoritarian states.

iPhone

Posted by silver57 on Wed, 09/02/2009 - 9:50pm
By amending other

By amending other legislation, Paul has barred funding for national identification numbers, funding for federal teacher certification,International Criminal Court jurisdiction over the U.S. military, American participation in any U.N. global tax, and surveillance on peaceful First Amendment activities by citizens.

Games

Posted by rocky111 on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 11:55pm
Together we'll educate

Together we'll educate voters about what the bailouts really mean. We'll go door to door, run television and radio ads, hold marches and protests, and make the news. essays.
Regards,

Posted by tauijoi on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 9:13pm
What an incredible

What an incredible opportunity the bankers and congress have given to us... the outrage of We, the People! Join us, come together with us as a community of Americans demanding accountability, and redirect that impotent outrage into something positive for America. Military Resume.
Regards,

Posted by tauijoi on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 9:11pm
Paul proposed term limit

Paul proposed term limit legislation multiple times, at first in the 1970s in the House where he also declined to attend junkets or register for a Congressional pension while serving four terms.

fatloss4idiots

Posted by silver57 on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 1:54am
Thanks for the encouragement

Thanks for the encouragement Daniel. It feels good to do something constructive toward solving these huge problems we're facing. Congratulations on your success with DeMint. That's an important step toward getting a majority of U.S. Senators on our side. Entry Level Resume.
Regards,

Posted by tauijoi on Wed, 08/26/2009 - 10:08am
RE:

Organizers say they'd like to raise "as much as possible," perhaps several million dollars,
Term Papers----
Researchpaper----
Term Paper Help----
Research Paper---
Custom Essay---
Custom Essay

Posted by RickyJones on Mon, 08/24/2009 - 1:14am
RE:

Beginning Thursday, blogs associated with both groups plan to begin plugging the joint-fundraising effort, asking their readers to pledge donations for the "money bomb" event.
live scores online---
international soccer scores---
hockey live scores---
football live score

Posted by RickyJones on Mon, 08/24/2009 - 1:13am
Re:

WASHINGTON -- The fight over immunity for telecom companies in domestic-spying legislation is creating an unexpected side effect: unity among liberal bloggers and Ron Paul supporters.
lacoste supplier---
ralph lauren wholesaler ----
wholesale distributor----
tommy hilfiger supplier----
abercrombie & fitch distributor----
calvin klein Wholesaler---
diesel jeans distributor

Posted by RickyJones on Mon, 08/24/2009 - 1:13am
Awesome work

I am hardcore libertarian and I think that working on issue specific alliances with respectable people on the left and right is a VERY powerful way to start attackign the establishment. I recommend that all democrats who are peaceful at heart to read Chapter 14 of Murray Rothbard's "For A New Liberty".

http://mises.org/books/newliberty.pdf ___________page 339

You will read some fo the most concise, logical convincing arguments for maintaining a non-interventionist foreign policy. You will see that mainstream democrats and republicans are consistently working against the common man.

There is no reason why truly peaceful democrats/non-interventionist republicans and libertarians should not start workign together. Carrol Quigley explained the system of control precisely, David Rockefeller has employed Kissinger and Brezinski for thei r entire lives....whoever wins(obama or McCain) America will still be under the control of a david rockefeller interventionist....we can fight these people, they intentionally keep us divided up over phony issues liek gay marriage and Murphy Brown...it is a silly trick to keep us from fighting the real enemey...the rockefeller,Kissinger, Brezinski, Neo-con-Clinton pro interventionist alliance!

gabeh73 Posted by gabeh73 on Wed, 07/09/2008 - 10:23am
When people from the other

When people from the other side rise up to join us, it is inevitable that some of them will land on our side after working alongside us on issues like this. Think of Cindy Sheehan's public support of Ron Paul as an example.

taislim

Himalayan goji

Posted by abel on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 2:16pm
Totally Agree!

Yes, our real work has to be to expose the real enemies to liberty: the neo-con agenda and its proponents! We have had no real government for decades; only those who belong to Skull and Bones who want to break our backs and keep our grandchildren in deep debt. Enough already!! The rhetoric between the two parties is just that: rhetoric. There will only be real change when we, the people, take control again. It is no wonder that Congress now has the lowest rating EVER (9%)...they do absolutely nothing. Folks, we are at a crossroads and re3VOLution is the only answer.

Posted by nemapunkin on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 7:36pm
I like everything except...

I like everything in the article except that the apecifiic use of the monies raised is unknown. It seems to weaken the whole effect of the action. I also feel a kindred uneasiness with theskeptic. I'm going to try to write it off as being overly suspicious about our liberal "friends". Can an old dog really change his spots and learn constitutional tricks? I tend to think not.

Cow A Bella, Ya'll!

cowabella@gmail.com Posted by cowabella@gmail.com on Wed, 07/02/2008 - 5:07pm
We MUST reach out to the left

I agree with Kent. If we continually stay on our side of the fence, we will never draw people to our side. We have to stand on top of that fence and shout out loud for what we believe in. When people from the other side rise up to join us, it is inevitable that some of them will land on our side after working alongside us on issues like this. Think of Cindy Sheehan's public support of Ron Paul as an example.

**************************
I'm surfing on a wave of nostalgia
for an age yet to come

--Pete Shelley

vincebodie Posted by vincebodie on Wed, 07/02/2008 - 10:44am
worry about present allies on Left

An important question, Tom.

May i suggest we demonstrate, in a direct, dispassionate way, the INEVITABLE link between big gov't and the abuses of our present mutual concern.

We can also point out that a freeer, more self-governing people is not at ALL antithetical to effective PROGRESS on many of the social inequalities/ problems (as opposed to the usual ineffective hot air and posturing) they (open-minded "lefties") are (rightly) concerned about.

We're just as opposed to "corporate" welfare as we are the perhaps more widely recognized "social welfare" (gov't handouts).

Posted by wwohler on Tue, 07/15/2008 - 11:17am
Re: What happens when

Take on allies where found. We may find we've a lot more in common than we first thought.

The thinking liberal's foundation of faith in a big federal government and big media must be shaken by what he sees they've conspired to in the past few years. More than ever, I hear liberals talk about the Constitution. Go figure that!

Kent

We have been lied to all our lives! Our children's American Dreams have been stolen!
The culprits are the thieves and megalomaniacs sitting in Washington D.C.

kent Posted by kent on Tue, 07/01/2008 - 3:57pm
My question to the left

is more fundamental than that. Ultimately, they believe that they have the right to take property by force from its rightful owner and give it to someone they deem needs it more. We believe that is armed robbery and and act of war. How will we bridge that without them giving up the core of what makes them "liberals?"

Tom Mullen

www.tommullen.net
www.myspace.com/skepticsongs

Tom Mullen Posted by Tom Mullen on Wed, 07/02/2008 - 11:11am
Good idea.

Good idea.

Posted by Pudding6 on Wed, 07/02/2008 - 3:03pm
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.